D
Deleted member 102539
Guest
The more incomprehensible, since she was already a twen and grown-up at the time of the "violent act". IMOSo SR is not going to be punished for her stupid teenage tantrum which hurt her Mother!
The more incomprehensible, since she was already a twen and grown-up at the time of the "violent act". IMOSo SR is not going to be punished for her stupid teenage tantrum which hurt her Mother!
This is correct.The more incomprehensible, since she was already a twen and grown-up at the time of the "violent act". IMO
Not to me. If SR not BR is the killer, his pleading guilty to manslaughter is a huge self-sacrifice. Is there anything in his past behaviour that makes that look likely? And if it explains SR's limited grieving, it leaves BR's stony selfishness out of account.The plot thickens but the strange behaviour is actually making so much sense.
JLZ you have no idea of this mans' past behaviour of when his daughter has caused a major act of violence against her Mother do you?Not to me. If SR not BR is the killer, his pleading guilty to manslaughter is a huge self-sacrifice. Is there anything in his past behaviour that makes that look likely? And if it explains SR's limited grieving, it leaves BR's stony selfishness out of account.
JLZ you have no idea of this mans' past behaviour of when his daughter has caused a major act of violence against her Mother do you?
A father may do it to save his daughter ....
The daughter didn't need saving. She wasn't suspected. On the contrary, the police were so confident that she was innocent, they had charged the father with murder.JLZ you have no idea of this mans' past behaviour of when his daughter has caused a major act of violence against her Mother do you?
A father may do it to save his daughter ....
Upon reflection now though, police only had the confidence to charge BR because they were told by DPP he could be guilty of Post - Offence conduct that they refcorded evidence of.The daughter didn't need saving. She wasn't suspected. On the contrary, the police were so confident that she was innocent, they had charged the father with murder.
Justice Beale has to pull something huge out his wig to do this though....sigh.I hope one day a lie detector test will show who did what. Until then we will never know, we only have our personal opinions and educated guesses with the limited information available. I hope that justice is served for Karen because she deserves this at the very least.
I have taken everything about AR with a big grain of salt Not looking for truth over there.What I don't understand is, why AR always stood to his half-sister and never said a negative word about her, when he made his contempt for his father so public as he did. He again and again told BR openly "to man up", named him "a coward" and demanded a confession. Does AR know more than we? Does he know less than we are assuming, the murder happened? Is he thinking, BR is to blame for SR's possible "violent act" and therefor has to take the penalty?
AR was on Karen's side, IMO, and I had expected a statement (disappointment/anger) in some form after BR pleading for manslaughter.
Is that, what happened "behind closed doors" and hadn't to be stated by him (as a witness), the reason for all the fatal trouble?
Oh, come on- Borce has been investigated, charged, committed for trial, and then pleaded guilty. We might not like how Sarah has conducted herself since her Mother went missing, but there is Zero evidence that she was involved. She has enough problems, which have been caused, in the main, by Borce.
Perhaps I misremember but I thought AR had plenty of negative words against SR up until a certain point when we thought she had a payout from the estate.What I don't understand is, why AR always stood to his half-sister and never said a negative word about her, when he made his contempt for his father so public as he did. He again and again told BR openly "to man up", named him "a coward" and demanded a confession. Does AR know more than we? Does he know less than we are assuming, the murder happened? Is he thinking, BR is to blame for SR's possible "violent act" and therefor has to take the penalty?
AR was on Karen's side, IMO, and I had expected a statement (disappointment/anger) in some form after BR pleading for manslaughter.
Is that, what happened "behind closed doors" and hadn't to be stated by him (as a witness), the reason for all the fatal trouble?
Why then is SR NOT holding BR accountable, in any manner, for her mother's killing and inhumane disposing of her body under logs, suffering animal degradation (with all due respect to Karen)?
All IMHO.
IMO because she somehow believes Karen is responsible for her own 'death'. So, all of the following actions by Borce - the coverup - are forgivable.
I think that Sarah is very likely convinced, thanks to daddy, that Karen was going off her tree at Borce, and Borce did something (pushed Karen?) and as a result Karen died.
I think the police believe there is more to it than that, hence the investigation into the dire finances, but they seem to not be able to adequately prove intent.
Justice Beale has to pull something huge out his wig to do this though....sigh.