I think that evidence is getting suppressed in this trial. Remember when we found out that reporters had to wait a few minutes before tweeting court proceedings to see if the judge was going to suppress testimony? I think it was in Simon Gittany’s trial perhaps.
There may be evidence that they don’t want made public, for whatever reason.
“But under the system they will be required to delay any reporting of evidence or submissions for 15 minutes, in case something needs to be suppressed.”
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-...owed-from-south-australian-courtrooms/4945520
(And don't feel silly, soso. We have
all misread things at one point or another. Some of us at many points, even. :blushing