Some news from the Coroners Office came through in the past week.
The full Findings Report is available at this Link below:
Coroners Office NSW -
Inquest into the disappearance and suspected death of Prabhdeep SRAWN
PDF
http://www.coroners.justice.nsw.gov....20Findings.pdf
Some extracts from the Report:
Inquest: Inquest into the disappearance and suspected death of Prabhdeep SRAWN
Hearing dates: 26-28 May 2015
Cooma Local Court
Date of findings: June 26 2015
Place of findings: State Coroners Court, Glebe
Findings of: Magistrate Harriet Grahame, Coroner
Catchwords: Coronial Law- Missing Person -Search and Rescue Operation
File number: 2014/104412
Representation: Sgt Paul Bush – Coronial Law Advocate – Advocate assisting
the Coroner Mr McDonald, solicitor- Representing the NSW National Parks
and Wildlife Service
Coroners Findings:
 On the balance of probabilities, I find that Prabhdeep Srawn is dead.
He died on or in the days shortly after 14 May 2013 .
 I am unable to determine the exact place of his death, however it occurred in the area of Kosciuszko
National Park.
 The exact cause of death remains unknown. However,on the balance, it appears that Prabhdeep’s death
occurred by misadventure of some kind.
Recommendations:
That the National Parks and Wildlife Service consider implementing better systems so that its website can
be updated and corrected in a timely manner.
 That the National Parks and Wildlife Service consider reviewing and expanding its educational material
aimed at bushwalkers, both on its website and more broadly, especially in relation to the potential dangers
found in the Australian Alpine conditions.
 That the National Parks and Wildlife Service and NSW Police immediately investigate and consider
implementing a web based trip intention lodgement system.
 That the National Parks and Wildlife Service consider ways of expanding and publicising its PLB loan
system in the Kosciuszko National Park.
Extracts from the Report - (My Bolds)
Page 17:
62. No physical evidence has been found in the area it is believed Prabh was bushwalking in despite an extensive land and air search.
63. Extensive inquiries made by police (56) indicate that there has been no subsequent administrative activity which might indicate Prabh is still alive.
There is for example no recorded movement out of the country, no relevant bank activity, no traffic or police records or anything of that nature.
There have been no credible sightings.
64. More importantly, Prabh’s family and friends have had no contact. Given the close relationships he had, it is inconceivable that he would not have
contacted his loved ones, if he were able to.
65. It should be stated, there is certainly no evidence to suggest that Prabh may have committed suicide.
He had no history of depression or mental health issues. He had no known medical problems. He was actively making plans for his future,
paying his University fees and planning a trip to Adelaide.
His flatmates were expecting to hear from him shortly to collect him from the airport so that that he could commence the next University term.
At the Inquest, his friend Carl Mannix, described Prabh as friendly and positive.
He seemed in good spirits and was happy and looking towards the future.
There is just no evidence to suggest a self-inflicted death. In my view, suicide can be safely ruled out.
66. There is also no evidence that Prabh’s disappearance was suspicious or that he
may have met with random foul play.
67. Equally, there is nothing to even hint at the possibility of a planned disappearance, rather all the available evidence points to a tragic encounter
with bad weather and rugged terrain.
----------
78. However, I understand from a short submission made to the Inquest from the Srawn family that at least some members of the family still believe Prabh may be
alive. They do not appear to accept that Prabh has perished even now, two years after his disappearance, stating “Nobody has evidence to proof (sic) that our
beloved Prabh is not alive but we are aware that there is a massive area notexplored so far. Our belief and conviction are that Prabh is right there.
Miracles do happen”.
Unfortunately, the family did not attend the Inquest and so their participation was limited. However, I have considered their written submission
carefully and while I find their obvious love for Prabh and their absolute commitment to finding him most admirable, I am unable, on the evidence
presented to share their view that Prabh could now be found alive.
79. Given the seriousness and finality of finding that a person is dead, proof of this issue “must be clear, cogent and exact” before a finding can be made.
The evidence in Prabh’s case reaches this threshold. While heartbreaking for his family, I am satisfied to the requisite standard that Prabh has perished somewhere
in the Kosciuszko National Park. While his body has never been located, I am of the view, on the balance of probabilities that it is comfortably established that
Prabhdeep Srawn is indeed dead.
80. It appears clear to this Court that if Prabh could have returned, he would have. If injury or illness hampered him to such a degree that he has not been able to make
contact over the last two years, those same injuries will have prevented him surviving in the rugged terrain and bad weather, with limited or no sustenance.
----------
To read the full Coroners Report:
http://www.coroners.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Prabhdeep Srawn Findings.pdf