Oh man :facepalm:
It just gets worse with this guy.
They kept this quiet, I have to say!!! Thanks to you sleuthers for finding it!!!
yet another very brazen attack which either shows sheer stupidity or a calculating and escalating serial rapist that thinks he can do it in his own bedroom and leave an electronic footprint of dealings leading up to the crime.There really are no words for this guy. He is chilling.
These are the five school mates from Melbourne, on a round-Australia fishing trip, who rescued the missing German girl after, inexplicably, a group of off-duty cops kept fishing instead of leading the search.
![]()
Her father says she has always been fiercely independent. He is fiercely proud.
She doesnt want people to feel sorry for her. She doesnt want to be a victim. She wont let a random encounter with evil steal the life she loves.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...k/news-story/f9328be56e6d1a731c75d4c5fe55a6ed
I just wanted to sat to the group of men posted in the above pic,I really hope your all proud of your actions in helping this young woman and I truly hope I raised my young son's to be as brave and moral if faced with a similar situation, your all awesome x
There really are no words for this guy. He is chilling.
The above implies that 9 further victims have provided statements. The mind boggles to think that's it's possible many more are prepared to face trial.
:seeya: Hello sweet MsAnais. You are gold!
It intrigues me that a small percentage of the population can float to the surface and do some of the most horrific acts upon other humans.
What separates a normal human to become a monster like this or maybe they were never normal.
Are they born like this and it lays dormant or is it incidences that happen to them that creates the evil? Maybe he was abused, did daddy take his teddy or he suffered a mental problem.
I firmly believe *advertiser censored*, especially violent *advertiser censored* addiction, can short-circuit the brain. Similar to long term drug taking. Interestingly Ted Bundy blamed *advertiser censored* addiction.
Your thoughts are invaluable.
I'm appalled at the lack of information we get from Sean Fewster, or any other reporter, who is tweeting on this case. In the past I've sat in front of my PC for hours waiting for the trial to start. We aren't informed when proceedings are likely to get underway and only occasionally get told when there's a break for lunch. Once the trial starts, you can wait for anything up to an hour or even more with no word re what's happening. I think it's just plain shoddy.
I can only say that South African reporting is the best I've seen by far. I can't comment on US trials because I haven't watched any live due to the time difference.
It's now 11:30 in South Australia and not one word.
Can someone please tell me if this lack of info is the norm for Aussie trials.
Noticed this today.
http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/CaseLists/Pages/Supreme-Criminal.aspx
Supreme Court - Criminal Jurisdiction Sir Samuel Way Building, Victoria Square, Adelaide Tuesday 18th April 2017 Note: Charges may change from the time this list is generated. Always check details with the Registry.
Case Details
Participant: H, R. (SUPPRESSED)
Complainant: THE QUEEN (STATE)
Charge: -
Hearing Type: For trial
Case #: 3 SCCRM-16-260
This type of suppression is not normal. I have only seen this type of suppression in cases involving incest with minors.I'm appalled at the lack of information we get from Sean Fewster, or any other reporter, who is tweeting on this case. In the past I've sat in front of my PC for hours waiting for the trial to start. We aren't informed when proceedings are likely to get underway and only occasionally get told when there's a break for lunch. Once the trial starts, you can wait for anything up to an hour or even more with no word re what's happening. I think it's just plain shoddy.
I can only say that South African reporting is the best I've seen by far. I can't comment on US trials because I haven't watched any live due to the time difference.
It's now 11:30 in South Australia and not one word.
Can someone please tell me if this lack of info is the norm for Aussie trials.
There was the earlier traffic / dangerous driving charges he had to appear in court for. Least serious charges are typically heard first.Tomorrow's case is showing as
Case Details
Participant: H, R. (SUPPRESSED)
Complainant: THE QUEEN (STATE)
Charge: -
Hearing Type: Part heard
Case #: 2 SCCRM-16-260
Noticing that for Tuesday it was Case #: 3 SCCRM-16-260 and for the backpacker trial it was Case #: 4 SCCRM-16-260. I am wondering if there are another 2 cases that we haven't heard about with at least one being tried today/yesterday.
I have no idea how case numbers are worked out so just a theory.