J has given directions, you should take into account WW level of intoxication with respect to her judgement. There is no suggestion of any experience with heights by her. The prosecution adduced evidence she was terrified. If you want to play Juror then you need to decide if that fear was force enough for her to have no option that to climb over. This is what jurors are asked to do, it is not helpful to make up issues of mental health here that simply are not relevant, of consider what any of us, or what GT or WW should have or could have done. J has also instructed to ignore that GT left building and ate a pizza.
BBM, In that case arent the jury being asked to speculate what was in WW's head at that point in time as to the reason what choice she felt she needed to take for what happened? And wouldn't that be speculation seeing as the jury don't know the answer to that?