SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 30,117
- Reaction score
- 184,656
I did not write that comment for you to infer it that way. My apologies that I did not better communicate that to you.
If the MFC believes how WT became a foster child is relevant to the investigation in his disappearance, he is using yet another mouthpiece he has access to (which the bios do not) to push yet another narrative that does not involve them in WT's disappearance (and focus on the less resourced bios).
Affluence = access. It's a huge issue when the affluent may be the guilty party.
Just my opinion and observation that is directly tied to the way this bungled investigation was conducted.
This 100%.
I don't buy into the affluence VS battler mentality.
It stands to reason that approved foster parents may generally be better placed to care for at-risk children ... better placed in the sense that they have room to house the at-risk child, they have a clear criminal history, they have no allegations of child abuse against them, they can feed/school/clothe/nurture the at-risk child, a parent may be able to afford to stay at home and care for the at-risk child so they have constant stability ... etc etc.
imo