katydid23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 67,933
- Reaction score
- 239,496
Just because you think you child would never wander, or never climb over the neighbours pool fence , etc, that doesn't mean you wouldn't go look just to be sure.
Going back to the start, I recall that the Foster Carers said that William would never wander. He knew his limitations and would stay a safe distance away.
I can’t help then to question why the Foster Mother would jump in her mothers car and drive a minimum 750m away to the riding school?
Has anyone ever heard a believable explanation of the drive when William was not a wanderer?
This drive before William was reported missing always concerned me as it contradicts the narrative.
It seems weird that we are questioning why she would jump in a car and take a drive to try and see if he had gotten further away. That's the first thing I did, both times that my escape artist puppy got out of our back gate.
What if she hadn't gone looking for him like that? Would we now be questioning why she didnt? Would that mean she knew what had happened already, so she didn't bother?