purpleandgreen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2015
- Messages
- 3,173
- Reaction score
- 9,736
Why not? We all have the right to be vexed, if we want. IMO.And equally they might NOT have a right to be!
Why not? We all have the right to be vexed, if we want. IMO.And equally they might NOT have a right to be!
I wish we knew someone who knew one of them, then we could find out for sure. I don't suppose any Wsers, or friends of any WSers can help? Would be great to know.Dont buy that for a nano second.
Curious what your theory is, pt? We've heard most other people's.Dont buy that for a nano second.
I wonder if one of them are not open to other theories and is singlemindedly sticking to one theory.Makes me wonder if Lambert was not ready for the case to go to the Coroner, but Jubelin has decided that is exactly what will now happen.
They both could be filled with deep disappointment that they have not been able to get the suspect(s) definitively tied down and charged, but Jubelin is known to utilise the coronial system to compel others to speak and try to break things open.
It is time.
JULY 5 - The latest search ends with Detective Chief Inspector Gary Jubelin saying the case could soon go to a coroner.
William Tyrrell clash: Lead detectives 'come to blows' during meeting about missing toddler | Daily Mail Online
I wonder if one of them are not open to other theories and is singlemindedly sticking to one theory.
None of these names have been DECLARED SUSPECTS by NSW Police
.
There might be 5 primary POI's/suspects but they all know each other and relate to the one general theory.And that is why they have allowed MSM to know that there are 5 primary POIs/suspects?
I think I believe Bo's suggestion that Lambert might have used Jubes’ tea mug and forgot to wash it up, more than thinking either of them is single minded.
There might be 5 primary POI's/suspects but they all know each other and relate to the one general theory.
Just a bit of dry humour...
Why is there no other MSM on this story? The public interest is there. All I can say about this situation is, you don't get acquitted unless there is reasonable doubt and with the documents the DPP had with terrible allegations against the defendant, the defence was able to prove reasonable doubt. With the DPP knowing that to begin with, why did they pursue the case? Again in Victoria, why did the DPP decide to prosecute to begin with if it didn't have compelling evidence or less evidence than the NSW case.
The damage has been done. BS name has been dragged through the press for about 3.5 years, ... < snip>
I would assume you have all heard about the historic and currently unsolved case known as Mr Cruel in Victoria.
I was very disturbed to find the No 2 SUSPECT in that case lived in Lake Cathie in a caravan park up until June 2014 and fled to canada with his canadian wife.
Yes he left before Williams abduction but why did he choose Lake Cathie to flee to from Victoria?
Then the attempted abduction of 6yo boy in Lake Cathie on 5 march 2015 one day after Long Point Trail search.
Too many things getting linked in this area.
I would assume you have all heard about the historic and currently unsolved case known as Mr Cruel in Victoria.
I was very disturbed to find the No 2 SUSPECT in that case lived in Lake Cathie in a caravan park up until June 2014 and fled to canada with his canadian wife.
Yes he left before Williams abduction but why did he choose Lake Cathie to flee to from Victoria?
Then the attempted abduction of 6yo boy in Lake Cathie on 5 march 2015 one day after Long Point Trail search.
Too many things getting linked in this area.
there was a member on here, I believe it was Puggle who was looking at this angle way back in the threads however I don not know any details. IMOI would assume you have all heard about the historic and currently unsolved case known as Mr Cruel in Victoria.
I was very disturbed to find the No 2 SUSPECT in that case lived in Lake Cathie in a caravan park up until June 2014 and fled to canada with his canadian wife.
Yes he left before Williams abduction but why did he choose Lake Cathie to flee to from Victoria?
Then the attempted abduction of 6yo boy in Lake Cathie on 5 march 2015 one day after Long Point Trail search.
Too many things getting linked in this area.
I can't even access one article a day from this media outlet. Why would this be in the media I wonder. Everything has been strategy so far. IMO
i think its quite feasible for William to have been quickly & silently 'grabbed' from the yard - no one was around, he was only 3 (many Mums will tell of picking up / carrying their 3 year old), hand over mouth for no sound if nothing else was available... and i also feel it the most likely scenario.Ah that's cool. The whole area around the house seems like an unlikely spot to disappear from, always keen to hear what people think!
I think you’re pretty close to the truth, Warshawski.i think its quite feasible for William to have been quickly & silently 'grabbed' from the yard - no one was around, he was only 3 (many Mums will tell of picking up / carrying their 3 year old), hand over mouth for no sound if nothing else was available... and i also feel it the most likely scenario.
His scent was only detected in the yard, and personally i doubt he would have wandered further afield - that early in the visit i'm sure there was much to keep his interest close to the house.
hi Bo, i agree, all are possible answers to the question of 'why'.Firstly, a sexual motive:
Someone heard the children talking, laughing, squealing whilst playing earlier that morning or they saw them whilst being in the street. Decided to take a look-see. Maybe had a ‘preference’ for young males. As DCI Jubelin said, ‘Evil met innocence.’ that day. Random, minimal planning, crime of opportunity.
Secondly, reunification of family:
First of all, biological parents have been cleared of any involvement into the investigation of William’s disappearance so either extended family member or friend hatched a plan to take William. Possibly achieved through relationships between known POIs and persons known to the public through MSM, ie; NC, KL, AJ, BS, etc. Maybe stalked the FF through SM or physically. Targeted and planned.
Thirdly, creation of family:
Someone took a shine to William, either spontaneously or over a period of time. Could have components of both of the MOs above. Either opportunistic or planned, random or targeted, depending on how the perpetrator first came into contact with William.
ETA: I think, sadly, the first is most likely.
hi Bo, i agree, all are possible answers to the question of 'why'.
(in response to the question of why only W in relation to scenario 2, perhaps it became only him available due to L's toilet trip)
I also think there's another option - payback.
are there people in the circle of associates of either FF or BF who may have been flexing their muscles ?
there was a member on here, I believe it was Puggle who was looking at this angle way back in the threads however I don not know any details. IMO
I do remember her posting about a suspect in the Mr Cruel case at Lake Cathie.I remember @Puggle did some extensive sleuthing of the ‘Mr Cruel’ crimes. I don’t know if she ever linked them to William’s case though. Maybe she’ll chime in with her thoughts on this.