Yes, and then there were some other witnesses, and then the mystery man. (I was thinking it might have been all right to identify DP in relation to the earlier evidence but not in relation to the later. Or it could be another person connected with 316, or what they're calling the sawmill could be somewhere else.)Oh... yes... could be. But didn't they identity at the start?
Sorry... I meant didn't DP identify at the start of their session?
Last edited: