Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #58

Status
Not open for further replies.
At the time of the inquest PS had memory trouble. For some time before that he was being mindf***ed by Jubelin. I'd want to know when was the first time he said he heard the children playing between those times.

I also thought Mrs Wilson heard the children playing that morning but was that earlier or when she was leaving at 9?

From memory 9am was about the time the foster father departed for Lakewood
 
I am wondering if in fact, some sort of remains have been discovered and that is why the specialists are there, to determine if that is where the original burial site is or bones were later removed. I hate to even think about it, but the latest news suggests as they said, they are looking for his remains

He’s such a tiny little boy.


84639D7B-0145-4411-B891-6271FDB00220.jpeg

When soil is disturbed and a body is buried a mound is formed but as the body decomposes a depression in the ground appears also LE could be looking at a small area where plants are thriving.
Geophysical monitoring of simulated homicide burials for forensic investigations | Scientific Reports
 
Her psychological profile could prove very interesting too!

IF the photos were taken at the time recorded according to metadata, then the foster father was not at 48 Benaroon Drive. Her testimony at the first tranche of Coroner's Inquest is where she stated she had driven out of Benaroon Drive and onto Batar Creek Road towards the riding school which is a turn right out of Benaroon. During her testimony she indicated she had driven out before he came home. Unless the police investigation has been able to disprove his telecommunication ping data and his modern vehicle GPS data his story appears to reflect the the truth currently.

I am hoping someone can help me with a link to the testimony that was in the media.



What I have noticed listening and watching the video recordings and documentaries is that it was the female foster carer that revealed the detail of the 2 vehicles and she continually over talked the male foster carer. It was also her that detailed the man in the vehicle that turned in the neighbours driveway and indicated William's sister had asked her about the vehicle. To me that just didn't make any sense at all. IMO

There is something about this photo that really niggled at my mind. She supported him and put herself closer to the poster, whereas he appears to withdraw from the poster and IMO puts himself very close to the wall trying to hide his turmoil. He didn't want to look at William.

View attachment 322239
Yes, she gives WAY too much detail in the video describing her interaction with the other car she noticed while looking for William.

The video I mean is at the top of the news article:
William Tyrrell’s foster dad details his frantic search for toddler
 
I will have to say IMO as I recall reading information out of the tranche she testified at. I will search

Edited to add link to media article

William Tyrrell's birth family says they felt under suspicion for years - NZ Herald

A bit of a play on words by (former) foster mother saying "After years of rumours and conspiracy theories they were involved in his abduction, William Tyrrell's birth family feel the stain of suspicion has lifted."

It may not have been abduction according to latest media articles
 
If FM is now the main suspect IMO this could mean that the recently deceased FGM may have collaborated with FM and given a false statement. Did FGM keep this secret and take it to the grave with her to protect her own daughter? If this was the case how long has FF known what happened? So many questions that I don't think can ever be answered.
 
Regarding the famous photo. Who changed the time stamp, and when? It doesn’t make sense to me to change the time. Any photos I take of my children, I really couldn’t care less what time the photo is time stamped. And I don’t understand why it would be changed to reflect the time it supposedly *should* have been. Why wouldn’t the FF or police just say, yes the time stamp is incorrect due to (insert reason).
 
I thought the camera was purchased in Bali and that the time stamp was because it was set to Bali time which is a couple of hours behind our time? Anyone recall that? I think it may have been discussed at the inquest?
 
just heard on nine news they are currently digging up the flower bed below the balcony in the fgms former benaroon drive home
also fps have been separated for awhile now according to numerous sm sources but i cant provide links so its my opinion only
So perhaps them both getting an AVO is a divide and conquer strategy to compel the FF to spill..
 
What sort of a person would Hide the truth all these years - whether it was accidental or not … and surely others close to them might be brought into the lies or suspect the lies … incomprehensible…
The rates of filicide are so high and distressing

maybe a person that considered she was above all others and the truth would never reveal itself.
 
I thought the camera was purchased in Bali and that the time stamp was because it was set to Bali time which is a couple of hours behind our time? Anyone recall that? I think it may have been discussed at the inquest?

I guess that the camera manufacturer would be able to verify that information. Also the retailer in Bali. The camera electronics could reveal what adjustments had been made to time metadata or time metadata set by the manufacturer.
 
Regarding the famous photo. Who changed the time stamp, and when? It doesn’t make sense to me to change the time. Any photos I take of my children, I really couldn’t care less what time the photo is time stamped. And I don’t understand why it would be changed to reflect the time it supposedly *should* have been. Why wouldn’t the FF or police just say, yes the time stamp is incorrect due to (insert reason).
Would you need to manually change the time either on a computer or via the camera itself? Or would the time stamp automatically update when the camera’s settings are changed? I’m imagining it would have to be manually changed, and yeah why would anyone bother unless they were doing so for a particular purpose
 
Not sure … whether (a) she would get the reward (b) and if others might actually benefit more

If she revealed anything that leads to a successful prosecution it may be possible she will be rewarded. If that is the case I would imagine any monetary reward would be protected by a totally independent Trust Fund Manager.
 
Not sure about anyone else, but I am very stuck on the title of the news article stating they are looking for disturbed ground. If he was buried there 7 years ago the ground would not be disturbed now. That says to me they have been following someone who has gone back and possibly moved him in recent times.
'Focused' search for William Tyrrell looking for 'disturbed ground'
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
101
Guests online
1,740
Total visitors
1,841

Forum statistics

Threads
598,152
Messages
18,076,324
Members
230,543
Latest member
bomber1978
Back
Top