CoverMeCagney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2013
- Messages
- 13,405
- Reaction score
- 65,260
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This one? Wherein a different member says she/he posted a video 'upthread'?:Have a look for post #921 in #63, post numbers show up in desktop view.
Apologies if this has been posted already. From yesterday:
EXCLUSIVE: Neighbour who saw 'a little boy in a Spider-Man suit' in a car on the DAY William Tyrrell disappeared breaks his silence - and claims cops are searching in the WRONG spot
William Tyrrell's foster grandmother's neighbour still CERTAIN he saw boy on day he vanished | Daily Mail Online
Not sure, but it makes sense that the child would be unrestrained if abducted (no child seat.)A gold or brown Landcruiser. Does that tally with any vehicles belonging to the families, neighbours, previous POI's?
Right.Not sure, but it makes sense that the child would be unrestrained if abducted (no child seat.)
A week or two ago, many were saying 'the police know exactly where to look for the remains---they must know the facts already--must have a witness, etc, etc'
But it appears to me like they are looking at a myriad of places, which could cover a whole bunch of scenarios. I am not sure I believe that this is 'not speculation.'
So far, off the top of my head, they searched the garden, the garage, the driveway, both sides of the creek, the riding stable, the pond, and now the dam, and the water tank, not to mention the huge pit they created.
It feels to me like they are suspicious of the FM and are looking everywhere they can think of that she might have had access to. But they do not have a confession or a witness to the actual events. JMO
A week or two ago, many were saying 'the police know exactly where to look for the remains---they must know the facts already--must have a witness, etc, etc'
But it appears to me like they are looking at a myriad of places, which could cover a whole bunch of scenarios. I am not sure I believe that this is 'not speculation.'
So far, off the top of my head, they searched the garden, the garage, the driveway, both sides of the creek, the riding stable, the pond, and now the dam, and the water tank, not to mention the huge pit they created.
It feels to me like they are suspicious of the FM and are looking everywhere they can think of that she might have had access to. But they do not have a confession or a witness to the actual events. JMO
Right.
But there are other possibilities as well. If you add the context of the speeding male following right behind, it makes me think of a domestic situation. And the mom/grandma might have quickly loaded her child into the back and sped off from an angry boyfriend?
Or with someone driving that recklessly, they may just be negligent and irresponsible, and dint buckle the child in, or ignored it when they unbuckled themselves and climbed out?
It could be a kidnapping, but I can't get my head around the witness not calling 000 once he saw the news. He swears he saw little William being abducted and he had a description of the car and driver and which way they were headed, and he doesn't report it?
Maybe they need the former to prove the latter . The body might might tie it all into place.( sorry to sound insensitive to Williams remains ). I still can’t get my head around fm being responsible though. FA I was so sure was the one .Even if WT's remains are found where they are looking it will be a miracle if they can come up with a cause of death, let alone identify a suspect, then prove it, which is OK. Maybe WT's legacy will be in regards to how missing child cases are handled in the future? Let the lessons fall where they belong, police will probably have to wear a lot of criticism, but that's not necessarily a bad thing if it means there are better outcomes down the track for other cases.
Yes it's doesNot sure, but it makes sense that the child would be unrestrained if abducted (no child seat.)
I could be off the mark here but it sounds like GJ was trying to pressure/bully/coerce PS into a confession with ZERO evidence that he was in any way involved??
That just sounds like a lonely old man who maybe losing his marbles a bit, IMO.
I think if ffc did it.. one chance that day....days..weeks later anybody could have put him close by somewhere....I'm just not sure why any of this was not done at the time with so many search people etc being that close to where he went missingMaybe they need the former to prove the latter . The body might might tie it all into place.( sorry to sound insensitive to Williams remains ). I still can’t get my head around fm being responsible though. FA I was so sure was the one .
Landcruiser are utes or people movers (troop carriers) . Single or dual cab or what you would call vans. I would not call a Landcruiser a car and I am not sure that anyone would.A gold or brown Landcruiser. Does that tally with any vehicles belonging to the families, neighbours, previous POI's?
A week or two ago, many were saying 'the police know exactly where to look for the remains---they must know the facts already--must have a witness, etc, etc'
But it appears to me like they are looking at a myriad of places, which could cover a whole bunch of scenarios. I am not sure I believe that this is 'not speculation.'
So far, off the top of my head, they searched the garden, the garage, the driveway, both sides of the creek, the riding stable, the pond, and now the dam, and the water tank, not to mention the huge pit they created.
It feels to me like they are suspicious of the FM and are looking everywhere they can think of that she might have had access to. But they do not have a confession or a witness to the actual events. JMO