They also named FGM as a POI in November 2021 ..(Big Dig) but FGM appears to have fallen off that POI list ..by the media at least ..
In November it was reported William’s foster mother and now-deceased foster grandmother were being treated as persons of interest in his disappearance.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/na...l/news-story/0c5a191c57ed5bdc465bfe11e193d3b2
My best guess, as to whom FM was referring to, (during that phone call) would be PS, due to the timing of his phone calls that morning …. And knowing that FM supported GJ with his phone tap case against PS …. Makes me wonder if FM also thought PS was involved, similar to the thoughts, of that of GJ ???
Of course it could be someone different entirely ???
IMO
I wonder if the foster grandmother wasn't looked at as a POI in error, assuming they'd be no way for the suspected events to have occurred without her awareness.
I think they underestimated the female caregiver's control over the situation. The foster grandmother and foster daughter were all very (pre)occupied, the one with her cooling tea and morning paper and the other paper, crayons and dedication.
How hard would it have been to explain away any sounds (Daddy Tiger, Mommy Monster), more time vs less time, utter silence?
How is it that the foster grandmother never heard her own car?
Also, how far away was the site where the truck driver encountered her? Is it possible she went up one way and down another from the house, not in search of Wm but in search of a place to conceal his body? Body here, shoes there...
I'm sorry -- no one tears off in a car after a missing child without screaming instructions to adults on site. Call the police. Call the male caregiver. Look everywhere. Call me if you find him.
That's a fatal tell to me. If she weren't involved, she couldn't know what happened to him. Maybe he climbed high in a tree, maybe he was hiding real good behind a leaf pile, maybe he went into the brush to potty --
If that drive were legit, there's no reason to keep it a secret.
Fact: IMO neither the foster grandmother nor the foster daughter knew she was gone. Neither so much time elapsing.
That drive to the airport has my ire. I think Wm was contained in something. Suitcase, blanket, lawn bag. Foster daughter may have been asleep, but even awake I can imagine the female caregiver working hard to plant false memories. Implanting the narrative.
She could easily have parked at that same spot where she'd been seen, open the trunk as if she's looking for something (you know, like imaginery-check to see if there's a suitcase for her sister, as if people fly without one and suddenly need one once they reach their destination). Grab Wm and head to the airport.
No doubt the foster daughter wasn't paying any attention and besides knew better than to question.
But I wish I could ask her:
After the female caregiver left and chaos broke out, how many elaborate pictures did you draw?
What do you recall about your ride to the airport? Were you awake? Was it dark or light outside? Did you stop anywhere? One time, two? Did the female caregiver exit the car?
I wonder if the poor girl weren't handed an unfair measure of blame, too. "If you'd have played nice with Wm...."
I hope she found her voice now!
JMO
