Charlie Bezzina on Sunrise this morning:
William Tyrrell's biological mother speaks out in 7NEWS Spotlight special
Former homicide detective Charlie Bezzina speaks about the case and the mothers comments.7news.com.au
She seen William enough though for him to still call her mummy and know what was his normal to a degree.
BBM how often did she see him?
all the above you statedJust WOW. Did somebody spring out of bed this morning and think: "Time to gaslight Williams biological mother and muddy the waters for detectives trying to help William!!!!"???
- "It's to be expected from a biological mother to be a little bit bitter"
So just dismiss a mothers instincts entirely then? Nothing to see here?
He has no formal connection to the case - so why even say this?!?!! Sounds to me more like a former Inspector is the bitter one. Just stop this, and let the relevant police do their job.
- "What it tells me is that it's a very week case against the FM, possibly circumstantial. If they had hard clear evidence they would of charged her themselves"
Reasonable point and we are all waiting. But he's speaking like he knows. He does not. There have been 9 cases of bodiless murder convictions in Australia, according to wikipedia. And maybe going via the DPP is them being very cautious with their proceedings, given the near-decade of weirdness around this case. They didn't expect all this to be played out in the media by podcasters, from what I can tell.
- "They've closed their mind to other potential suspects"
Oh really?! How does he actually know this?! Why bother saying it?! The current police have a whopping 9 years of research into POIs at their finger tips. For someone with such a profile to claim they've "closed their minds" is highly undermining.
- "For the FM to learn about these charges through the media is absolutely disgraceful"
Agreed, and it's not like it's the first time things have been done via the media... right? But the true disgrace here is the way a senior ex-officer can blame current investigators for this, which so far it seems is not the case at all. It's almost like he himself is trying to paint a narrative to protect some interest. It's REALLY not helpful.
- "And the fact is if it doesn't proceed she will always be under that shadow"
What... do you mean this shadow?!
- "And a lot of people don't know the intricate details of the case"
.... clearly!
- "And I've spoken at length to Gary J"
Oh, I see! The celebrity who hasn't been close to the case for almost 4 years?
- "[GJ] is the only person charged with an offence during the investigation"
Outright lie. Spedding was charged too and that was later dropped. Yes, BS' charges did not directly relate to WT, but same could be said for those of GJ's indiscretion. We could debate if GJ's charges were a bit of a beat up or not, but Bezzina is really showing his colours here.
- "Alot of people don't realise she [FM] wasn't home alone at the time. There were other people present at the time William went missing"
It was one other person, not "people". Really poor confusing wording, trying to make the police seem incompetent for God-knows-why. Really odd "what about" angles coming from the Celebrity Badness camp - it's almost political speak at this stage.
- "During the four year investigation that Gary had, not a leak was ever had"
Christ-all-mighty!!!
The media was camped out outside BS' house a full 8 hours before the arresting police arrived.
They inexplicably released walkthrough video.
Etc.
This tribal catfighting in the police force is an abysmal turn of events for William.
I would hate for this to influence any potential DPP process.
The gaggle of gossipy, celebrity podcasters need to stop interfering. WHY are they even doing this?! Not for WT, that's for sure. I can only think of three reasons:
- They have a vendetta against the current investigators.
- They are somehow too close to the Foster arrangement. (FF pushed for GJ to give evidence at the Inquest, after all).
- It's good for their profile when releasing book$ and podcast$. Tough guy image, etc.
hmmm
Nat Barr's chilling William Tyrrell question as boy's mum speaks out
William Tyrrell's. biological mother admitted that she was worried about how her son was being looked after in new never-seen-before footage from a TV interview she did with Seven in 2018.www.google.com
And trying to stay relevantall the above you stated
ego and $$$$$$
Just WOW. Did somebody spring out of bed this morning and think: "Time to gaslight Williams biological mother and muddy the waters for detectives trying to help William!!!!"???
- "It's to be expected from a biological mother to be a little bit bitter"
So just dismiss a mothers instincts entirely then? Nothing to see here?
He has no formal connection to the case - so why even say this?!?!! Sounds to me more like a former Inspector is the bitter one. Just stop this, and let the relevant police do their job.
- "What it tells me is that it's a very week case against the FM, possibly circumstantial. If they had hard clear evidence they would of charged her themselves"
Reasonable point and we are all waiting. But he's speaking like he knows. He does not. There have been 9 cases of bodiless murder convictions in Australia, according to wikipedia. And maybe going via the DPP is them being very cautious with their proceedings, given the near-decade of weirdness around this case. They didn't expect all this to be played out in the media by podcasters, from what I can tell.
- "They've closed their mind to other potential suspects"
Oh really?! How does he actually know this?! Why bother saying it?! The current police have a whopping 9 years of research into POIs at their finger tips. For someone with such a profile to claim they've "closed their minds" is highly undermining.
- "For the FM to learn about these charges through the media is absolutely disgraceful"
Agreed, and it's not like it's the first time things have been done via the media... right? But the true disgrace here is the way a senior ex-officer can blame current investigators for this, which so far it seems is not the case at all. It's almost like he himself is trying to paint a narrative to protect some interest. It's REALLY not helpful.
- "And the fact is if it doesn't proceed she will always be under that shadow"
What... do you mean this shadow?!
- "And a lot of people don't know the intricate details of the case"
.... clearly!
- "And I've spoken at length to Gary J"
Oh, I see! The celebrity who hasn't been close to the case for almost 4 years?
- "[GJ] is the only person charged with an offence during the investigation"
Outright lie. Spedding was charged too and that was later dropped. Yes, BS' charges did not directly relate to WT, but same could be said for those of GJ's indiscretion. We could debate if GJ's charges were a bit of a beat up or not, but Bezzina is really showing his colours here.
- "Alot of people don't realise she [FM] wasn't home alone at the time. There were other people present at the time William went missing"
It was one other person, not "people". Really poor confusing wording, trying to make the police seem incompetent for God-knows-why. Really odd "what about" angles coming from the Celebrity Badness camp - it's almost political speak at this stage.
- "During the four year investigation that Gary had, not a leak was ever had"
Christ-all-mighty!!!
The media was camped out outside BS' house a full 8 hours before the arresting police arrived.
They inexplicably released walkthrough video.
Etc.
This tribal catfighting in the police force is an abysmal turn of events for William.
I would hate for this to influence any potential DPP process.
The gaggle of gossipy, celebrity podcasters need to stop interfering. WHY are they even doing this?! Not for WT, that's for sure. I can only think of three reasons:
- They have a vendetta against the current investigators.
- They are somehow too close to the Foster arrangement. (FF pushed for GJ to give evidence at the Inquest, after all).
- It's good for their profile when releasing book$ and podcast$. Tough guy image, etc.
He missed out calling her hysterical....Just WOW. Did somebody spring out of bed this morning and think: "Time to gaslight Williams biological mother and muddy the waters for detectives trying to help William!!!!"???
- "It's to be expected from a biological mother to be a little bit bitter"
So just dismiss a mothers instincts entirely then? Nothing to see here?
He has no formal connection to the case - so why even say this?!?!! Sounds to me more like a former Inspector is the bitter one. Just stop this, and let the relevant police do their job.
- "What it tells me is that it's a very week case against the FM, possibly circumstantial. If they had hard clear evidence they would of charged her themselves"
Reasonable point and we are all waiting. But he's speaking like he knows. He does not. There have been 9 cases of bodiless murder convictions in Australia, according to wikipedia. And maybe going via the DPP is them being very cautious with their proceedings, given the near-decade of weirdness around this case. They didn't expect all this to be played out in the media by podcasters, from what I can tell.
- "They've closed their mind to other potential suspects"
Oh really?! How does he actually know this?! Why bother saying it?! The current police have a whopping 9 years of research into POIs at their finger tips. For someone with such a profile to claim they've "closed their minds" is highly undermining.
- "For the FM to learn about these charges through the media is absolutely disgraceful"
Agreed, and it's not like it's the first time things have been done via the media... right? But the true disgrace here is the way a senior ex-officer can blame current investigators for this, which so far it seems is not the case at all. It's almost like he himself is trying to paint a narrative to protect some interest. It's REALLY not helpful.
- "And the fact is if it doesn't proceed she will always be under that shadow"
What... do you mean this shadow?!
- "And a lot of people don't know the intricate details of the case"
.... clearly!
- "And I've spoken at length to Gary J"
Oh, I see! The celebrity who hasn't been close to the case for almost 4 years?
- "[GJ] is the only person charged with an offence during the investigation"
Outright lie. Spedding was charged too and that was later dropped. Yes, BS' charges did not directly relate to WT, but same could be said for those of GJ's indiscretion. We could debate if GJ's charges were a bit of a beat up or not, but Bezzina is really showing his colours here.
- "Alot of people don't realise she [FM] wasn't home alone at the time. There were other people present at the time William went missing"
It was one other person, not "people". Really poor confusing wording, trying to make the police seem incompetent for God-knows-why. Really odd "what about" angles coming from the Celebrity Badness camp - it's almost political speak at this stage.
- "During the four year investigation that Gary had, not a leak was ever had"
Christ-all-mighty!!!
The media was camped out outside BS' house a full 8 hours before the arresting police arrived.
They inexplicably released walkthrough video.
Etc.
This tribal catfighting in the police force is an abysmal turn of events for William.
I would hate for this to influence any potential DPP process.
The gaggle of gossipy, celebrity podcasters need to stop interfering. WHY are they even doing this?! Not for WT, that's for sure. I can only think of three reasons:
- They have a vendetta against the current investigators.
- They are somehow too close to the Foster arrangement. (FF pushed for GJ to give evidence at the Inquest, after all).
- It's good for their profile when releasing book$ and podcast$. Tough guy image, etc.
BBM She wasn’t “seen”, it’s just another “belief” from a source.Focusing on “THE DRIVE” that FM took in her mothers car shortly after William went missing (Yes the drive she did not tell Police about).
1. FM was seen to be throwing something out the window of the vehicle.
This is why police so heavily searched the area she was seen to be throwing something from the car from and then impounded the car to be tested again.
If I walk as briskly as I can it takes around 10 minutes to walk a kilometre. This is the approximate distance the car was seen from FGM house. Does FM truly think a 3 year old boy who does not know the area would randomly go this far in such a short amount of time??
Why does FM make no mention of the drive in the 000 call. Why does she make no mention of the drive to FF when he arrives home (“William was just here 5 minutes ago”. Why does FGM make no mention of the drive?
THE DRIVE heavily fails the BS test IMO.
The FM has clearly and repeatedly said William is not a wanderer. Why drive 1km away randomly to look for him if he is not a wanderer?
I’m calling BS and it’s not Mr Spedding.
William Tyrrell car seized by cops was 'driven by foster mother'
A grey Mazda which once belonged to William's late foster grandmother was allegedly used by his foster mother near the spot on the NSW mid north coast where the toddler disappeared.www.dailymail.co.uk
