Madeleine74
Knower of Things
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
- Messages
- 11,556
- Reaction score
- 20,084
I have such bewilderment after hearing this interview. I just don't get how they can be so non-chalant, there was just no DEPERATION in their tone, IMO. I'm a mother of two very young daughters and everytime I see Isa's picture, I think about how I would be BEYOND desperate if anyone ever took either of them. I probably could not eat or sleep until I knew where my daughter was.
BBM. And consequently, if a parent KNEW where their child was, knew they were deceased (not in some kidnapper's clutches), and knew they were not coming back, they wouldn't be "frantic" since there would be no reason to worry. And neither parent is worried about the other 2 children or someone abducting them.
If the parents aren't worried then there's a good reason for it. It's a simple equation, really. She's likely not alive anymore and probably hasn't been since some point between 11pm and 8am that April night. Worry is about "is someone hurting my child" "is my child being taken care of and fed and clothed." Do we see that kind of worry in this case, at this point?
If SC and RC are not worried then the public apparently has no reason to worry. "Bringing Isa Home" in this scenario means... in a box. The rest of it is all legal/prosecution/punishment.