Section in blue:
Wrong place wrong time. "He was in a state in which he was exposed" ? "Depravity"? What exactly do you mean here specifically? That....what? He was caught 'in a state' and then acted in a depraved way because he was 'in a state'? This theory sounds vaguely familiar to one I've heard on another thread. Please extrapolate further.
Section in red:
That JJR ever left is an assumption that can only be made if you cherry pick TG's quotes. In other MSM quotes, TG herself said her daughter called and said she couldn't find Justin or Bella. TG also said she never saw Justin......and he was on the other side of the glass door when she left. Never seeing him on 9/1 is demonstrably false if she saw him anywhere near her sliding door. TG is an extremely unreliable witness. That's about all we can assume from any of her statements.
Section in green:
Occam's Razor: the principle (attributed to William of Occam) that in explaining a thing, no more assumptions should be made than are necessary. The principle is often invoked to defend reductionism or nominalism.
In the theory you put forth, we have to believe:
1) TG simultaneously never saw JR on 9/1, saw him just leaving, and also knew he was there all along (she has reported all three)
2) RF completely forgot JR's existence, when he was befuddled on his 911 call, and the entire time LE was questioning him
3) TG completely forgot JR's existence the entire time they were questioning her.
4) That LE only asked the 10 year old about JJR's existence. (and how could they do that, they didn't know he existed until she told them)
5) TG is a reliable witness who never saw JJR, saw him leave, and knew he was there the whole time AND the reporters have misconstrued this.
6) Though the grandmother and the daughter both say TG was communicating with JJR, and Mods and posters on this thread have seen things to corroborate this, TG is the truthful one, with three versions, and the grandmother, daughter, a mod, and several posters are all the ones lying. It's a conspiracy of lies, and TG is the one person telling three truths.
7) 10 year old has nearly photographic memory of Bella's clothing and is exactly right about who Bella was with, but was in a fog about what her mother was doing during the time before 911 was called.
The theory that is most widely held, TG and RF knowingly left two little girls with a high risk felon. The home was a flop house for felons, drug addicts, and possibly stolen weapons fencing, as evidenced by recent arrests and police reports. 10 year old called in a panic because BOTH Bella and JJR were missing. TG did not immediately call 911. TG never called 911. TG likely exchanged words with JJR is some way. TG came home. 40 more minutes were wasted not calling 911. 911 finally placed by step father sounding non-urgent. No idea where she could be. Except maybe here and here. Her sister says she can't find HER. Not them. It's odd because she usually doesn't leave BY HERSELF. LE come and TG and RF still do not mention JJR. In any way. It is up to the 10 year old. Who according to TG is not to be believed, unless she's accurately describing clothes last seen wearing or, you know, who was here today and tonight. The not calling 911 immediately and with urgency for their beloved daughter was to buy time for themselves for some reason. This 'amnesia' and 'befuddlement' is because they felt compelled to not out JJR's involvement to police.
For this theory to be true one must assume:
1) TG and RF would lie to LE. Have they ever lied to LE? Have they had reason to hide anything from LE ever?
2) TG and RF had something to hide from LE that they felt was more important than helping Bella. See above two questions.
Two assumptions have to be made. No rationalizations for befuddled parents, three versions, multiple discombobulated reporters, parental amnesia, lying mothers, lying ten year olds.
Occam's razor: No more assumptions should be made than are necessary.
