Wow, Fran, thank you for this link, it is by far the best! Now we have that confirmed about Tim for those who were doubtful.
We also have the bio mother's estranged husband who says the boy was a good kid, yet conflicting reports from Vincent's side saying the boy would tell his dad he:
"According to the report, "[The uncle] overheard [the boy] say, 'One day I'm going to kill him.' [The uncle] told Vincent [Romero] what [the boy] said, and Vincent responded by slapping [the boy]. The date of the incident remained undetermined."
and
"In a separate supplement filed by Det. James Anderson and Sgt. M. Livingston, an interview with a "very close" cousin revealed "during a game of horse shoes at his family reunion on August 2, 2008, [the cousin] heard [the boy] tell his dad 'I'll shoot you' or 'I'll kill you dad.' [The cousin] stated he said it in anger. He said after [the boy] said it he ran off. [The cousin] said Vince told [the boy], 'How dare you say that.' [The cousin] did not recall anything that happned after that. [The cousin] stated that was the only time he had ever seen [the boy] act like that."
(from Fran's link)
http://www.abc15.com/content/news/n...ed-new-info-about/fOVJy2sP1kCOthT-AEZCsQ.cspx
I wonder if the "very close" cousin is also a son of the uncle that overheard the boy say these things. If he did say them, i think that points to the fact that the boy was in an abusive situation at home. For a child to say such things, they'd have to be very wronged by a parent.
Then bio mom's estranged husband never heard such things from the boy and said he was very good with no tantrums. In a different environment, the boy is stable not acting out.
"Later in the supplemental report detectives learned,
"the two cell phones belonging to Vincent Reomero and Timothy Romans contained photographs, which had been accessed by DPS Computer Forensics Unit (CFU) personnel... Vincent's telephone contained a photograph of a young boy, displaying what appeared to be a black eye." However, according to the reports, the identity of the young boy remained unclear."
Why did Vincent's phone have a photo of a young boy with a black eye? Is it the boy? Would he show the picture to his son as a threat?
As for Tim, i don't think he stopped selling drugs. Remember the evidence photos way back in the beginning? Wasn't money photographed as well?
Why photograph money unless the LE who did thought it was drug money or related to the crimes?
""Vasey stated she contacted the SCTPD who said
Tim Romans had been arrested and was known to be a mid-level drug dealer. He had several people who dealt methamphetamine for him at the street level. One of those people...stated a week prior to the shooting Tim called her saying someone wanted to kill him."
LE botched this whole investigation. They should have jumped on the Tim the drug dealer angle from the start, instead of coercing an 8 year old into a confession that can't be used in court anyway.
One has to question Vincent's judgment of having a drug dealer living in his home. I'm sure he knew what Tim was doing, they were good friends enough, he even let Tim live in his house in a room down the hall from his boy's room.