Is it logical to believe everything that is said about the two murder victims but disbelieve everything that is said about the boy?
Hi Bobbisangel - maybe you didn't catch the part in my post where I said I don't necessarily believe everything said about the victims NOR do I believe everything said about the child.
The media is the media. After following the MMcCann and Anthony cases, I have found it prudent to reserve judgment on media "disclosures" until such disclosures are substantiated by additional sources.
However, I will admit, Tim is looking more and more squirrelly to me.... infidelity, drug dealing and *advertiser censored* on his phone. So far only the drug dealing appears to be backed up by LE. I'm not sure what to think of the infidelity - given that some woman said he was going to divorce his wife and marry her and she posted such on her myspace. I suppose she could be lying for her 15 minutes.. I don't know. I did think it was in very poor taste. Not sure where the *advertiser censored* info originated from, I think the media. It was not repeated in the article about VR's phone with the picture of the boy with the black eye, so again, I'm not sure what to think.
TR was apparently a drug dealer and dealt with meth though, according to the article and the author claimed to have access to actual witness reports. I do know I wouldn't trust a meth user or a meth dealer and just this one fact would raise my hinky meter to red alert levels
Salem