Wow, this thread got really hot really fast!
My experience in following crimes in the news with reverse speech (RS) has been that I can always count on a couple of things. In cases where the main person of interests RS indicates they may be involved, the supporters for that person come out of the woodwork bashing RS. When at the same time they havent spent one moment researching the phenomena. When the main person of interests RS indicates they are not involved, the haters of the person in question come out the same way. In this case, there is another dynamic where not only do the main people that seem to be of interest, Ronald & Misty, do not have any examples of RS indicating involvement, there appears to be someone who is. This is the first time Ive been able to come across this.
My speculation is when after interview, after interview, of Misty has been reviewed there has been no indication of her involvement through her RS, this may have been an inconvenient stone in the shoe for the Misty haters. Now that the RS of her brother Tommy appears to indicate his involvement, this may have sent the Misty haters into a tailspin fighting tooth and nail to hold onto their beliefs. The Tommy supporters may be here as well.
On a side note to all: If there is nothing to reverse speech, why is it Electroencephalograph (EEG) tests have shown that brain activity alters significantly when RS occurs? Additionally, California State University published a paper that found the brain was able to decode speech backwards. If there is nothing to RS how could they have made that finding?
There are thousands and thousands of examples of true RS examples available that have been contributed by countless people from around the globe for the past twenty five years, so tell me how someones claim that there is nothing to RS could have any validity.
For those that claim there is no validity to RS please explain away the following;
- There was case I was following about
Sam Parker where he had been suspected in the disappearance of his wife. After the culmination of more than 50 examples of RS it was clear that he was involved in the murder of his wife. And there were aspects of his reversals that came out in trial testimony. The case came to conclusion last month where he was found guilty of murder. My findings were posted about 15 months prior to his conviction.
- In another crime in the news.
Gary Hilton confessed to murdering a woman, led authorities to her body, and was convicted in her murder. 5 out of 5 speech reversals from a portion of his confession tape clearly indicate his involvement in the crime.
- In
The Lying Experiment over 16,000 people participated in a study to see if they could determine in which of 2 videos of a man that was claiming he liked different movies in was he lying about. The result of the study was that 70% of the people correctly determined in which video he was lying. The key is it didnt matter if they watched the video or not the results were the same. If their clues were not visual, then what else could it be? There were 3 videos, movie A, movie B and the reveal of which one was the lie. Movie A was the lie. After my review of all 3 videos for RS, movie A is the only video where reversals could be found, and his RS indicated the lie.
- A man by the name of
Andrew Haley went by the name Catchmekiller on You Tube. He posted a couple of videos claiming to be the killer of 16 women. In his game he was going to reveal clues that would lead people to their bodies in each video. I am following the case of
Tara Grinstead who was one of the women he claimed to have killed. He sent me a message challenging me to find through his RS he was not the killer. I obliged. His RS from one of the videos clearly indicated he was not a killer. 4 months later he was indicted by a grand jury, and arrested for making false claims.
