ShawnHS
New Member
If you read my post you would see that I have already addressed this, but let's try again;You prove to me that this happened to Oats and I will back down. I know you can't prove it. If you can't prove it then guess what? That is my proof.
[FONT="]David J. Oates says Officials in Washington DC expressed interest in my work, but this abruptly ceased when I uncovered a Desert Storm code word embedded backwards into George Bush's speeches. A secret memo sent to Defense Secretary Dick Cheney was leaked to the press and the story hit international headlines. I was asked to keep quiet, and many of my lectures around the country were canceled including a research project that was being arranged with the Michigan state police.
[/FONT]In case the "[FONT="] secret memo" with the United States Senate letterhead is not readable to you allow me to retype it:
October 3, 1990
The Honorable Dick Cheney
Secretary of Defense
The Pentagon
Washington D.C. 20301-1155
[/FONT]
Dear Dick,
By a technology know as Reverse Speech Therapy, several of us have been following statements made by principal actors involved in the current Persian Gulf crisis.
In statements made about Iraq by President Bush, Secretary of state Baker and yourself, a word we have never seen in a speech reversal has appeared. The word is "Simone".
I mention this situation in case it is a code word that might not be in the national interest to be known.
If the word is significant, please contact me and I will provide details about the technology and assist in any way that I can in whatever the situation may be.
Warm Regards,
C.B. Scott Jones
Special Assistant
Really. I don't know how I could have been any clearer. Let me restate it - "...Its uses in law enforcement alone are fantastic. It can reveal the location of missing evidence, and the motives for a crime. It can reveal the guilt or innocence of a suspect. Therefore reverse speech analysis is an excellent tool to help investigators to narrow the focus of an investigation. And if you had read the articles I have referenced you would have seen LE agencies have been using reverse speech to aid in their investigations with successful results..."You didn't answer my question about the detectives. You very cleverly blew it off by saying you never said we did not need detectives.
Did you ever stop to think not all may be aware of it?...What I want to know is how come the detectives are not using this reverse speech to solve all their crimes...
In case you have an aversion to me using a link as a source, here is some of the transcript from a letter from Southern Oregon University that offered a course on Reverse Speech for the Oregon State Police.If it works it would be easy to prove. You can't prove it works and you will dance around this question again...
...As it stands now NO ONE in the real world of crime uses this to solve cases...
RE: Southern Oregon University SOC SCI 407:
INTRO REVERSE SPEECH ANALYSIS:
OR DOJ DEPT / PUBLIC SAFETY STDS & TRAINING CERTIFIED
COURSE #02CP098
REVERSE SPEECH ANALYSIS TRACK RECORD EXAMPLES
- In a case of alleged rape, the plaintiff had told detectives that she had not been sexually active, even with her boyfriend, for at least 72 hours prior to the alleged rape. The Reverse Speech Analysis revealed, in her own voice, a persons name and a statement of sexual activity embedded in her statement describing events on the night of the alleged incident.
- In a homicide case, a witness to the incident revealed in the covert (Reverse Speech) channel a specific (and unusual) first name of someone who would tell all. Interview of the party mentioned, and of her daughter, produced information material to the case.
When describing how her ex-boyfriend allegedly shot and killed the victim, she produced a reversal that said: Ikill glad you [s.o.b.], you will deal when I 'law'!" ("law" is a Reverse Speech metaphor that in this context means when I say so!), thereby indicating that she had a lot more to do with the victims death, and that it apparently was revenge for his not continuing to include her as a partner in his drug dealing activities.
This motive re: the victims allegedly dealing drugs without the speakers permission was confirmed by the retaining attorney as a probable motive for the homicide, based on statements of other persons having knowledge of the speakers relationship with the victim, and their involvement with drug dealing.
- In another homicide case, Reverse Speech Analysis of a statement of the suspect as he was denying his adult sons alleged affair with the victims wife directly contradicted his denial, when nearly got caught appeared in the covert channel. This Reverse Speech statement by the suspect offered material insight into a possible cause of the argument between the suspect and the victim that had resulted in the victims death.
The victims wife, who was party to the affair profiled by the Reverse Speech Analysis, when confronted with the investigators knowledge of the affair, demonstrated shock, and then admitted to the affair in her deposition.
FOR REFERENCE, PLEASE CONTACT:
Dr. Lee Ayers
Chair, Department of Criminology
Southern Oregon University
Ashland, Oregon
Professor Janet E. McClellan
Lead Faculty (Chair)
Department of Criminal Justice
Coos Community College
Coos Bay, Oregon
One can only hope!...You can post a bunch of really long posts but common sense will rule here I am sure.