FigTree
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2013
- Messages
- 3,476
- Reaction score
- 385
I notice HM is really re-writing the narrative in her latest interviews. I'm wondering when someone will ask her about the discrepancy between her current version of events and what she and TS allegedly confessed to and re-enacted.
IIUC, the current story is: TS had an 'altercation' with SWM, HM is completely innocent - and there's no proof that someone else didn't kill SWM.
My bold -
I think there was a time where they were plying this angle - and yet there is plenty of proof that no-one else - especially a gang - entered Sheila's room - only TS (HM was already in the room). CCTV anyone?
It would be ridiculous if she thinks thats still a plausible defense.
I dont know how HM can possibly think that she can be viewed as totally innocent - she is kidding herself. It is the worst possible scenario for her - the judges residing over these trials are more lenient if people confess - she is setting herself up a treat to go down all the way.
With the evidence coming in now - she cant back track either.