azwriter
Sister Mary Wanna
Hi guys! I just finished reading the document dump. Whoa. Since it's fresh in my mind, I wanted to respond to one issue in this post. With regard to the pictures of Haleigh's black eye, etc., Kim said in her papers that she was asked by Marie to give a lot of info to the media to hurt Ron's rep. Kim said she did not feel comfortable complying with Marie's every request. Further, Kim said that it was AFTER she showed the abuse photos that she became aware that the DCFS already had investigated this, and cleared Ron. The clients I guess FORGOT to tell her this pretty important fact. She had egg on her face, she implied. At least that's what I got out of the documents.
If an attorney isn't given truthful info by her clients, the lawyer can't represent them well. I'd sure hate to have gone on Nancy Grace and been chewed up like that because of something my client was hiding from me. I'd blame the lawyer for not doing her homework on this one, but these DCFS complaints are highly confidential. NO ONE can get copies of them. I remember trying to get one for my ex husband, but it was not allowed.
BBM
Good post, Shawdy. I agree with your points. And yes, it is nearly impossible for the public to get copies of child welfare investigations. But, as an attorney, Kim is an officer of the court and could have at least learned whether or not an investigation was conducted on the suspected abuse even if she could never have information on the investigation itself.
She was amiss in not knowing more about her client.