Twoapennything
Inactive
Another angle to consider is that whenever bond is granted, the Court will impose certain conditions of bond for the accused to abide by, if the accused is going to be extended the opportunity to remain in the community while the criminal charges are still pending. Here in Colorado, often conditions of bond include terms such as No use of alcohol or drugs, pre-trial services and monitoring (which often include random drug screens or alcohol testing, etc), Compliance with any exisiting terms and conditions of probation or parole, and, very often . . . NO NEW CRIMINAL OFFENSES! Perhaps LE chose to file the forgery/fraud/theft charges at this particular time, as a strategy to assist the bondsmen in FL in revoking the existing bond that LP arranged. While I'm not sure whether a bond agency has the right to revoke bond just because they want to, or because they don't like the defendant -- I can imagine a good defense attorney would claim that due process was denied if bail were revoked for a nebulous reason. However, were new criminal charges filed, it might provide a more legally sound precedent for revoking bond. That said, I would wonder, if the new charges were included or considered in the decision to revoke bond, whether it would matter if the alleged forgery/fraud occurred before or after Casey Anthony was charged in the present matter of little Caylee's disappearance. Well, food for thought!