I disagree with the other poster's opinion. If the other fingerprints were not important enough to be analyzed or submitted as evidence, why would the Crown enter as evidence a list of areas that were tested but found NO gun shot residue.
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/key-to-tim-bosmas-truck-found-in-suspects-suv-police
LE took prints from wherever in the truck they found what they thought *could be* viable prints, had them compared to the obvious parties. Out of 23 presumably viable prints, 2 of them were matched to DM. We can assume that none of them matched to MS, since he was also an obvious party as one of the accuseds. I am sure they compared all 23 to the test subjects. There could have been many other peoples' prints in the truck as well, people from TB's jobsites, TB's family/friends, anyone else who may have looked to buy TB's truck in the past? But LE had a great lead on who the murderer could be, when they found TB's truck at DM's mother's house, so from there the investigation unfolded, and more and more evidence was collected to support the same outcome. If you go to your doctor and you have a symptom which could be 20 different things, the doc is going to start with the most obvious/basic, and start ruling out possibilities of various diagnoses from there.. he/she is not going to order tests for all 20 things right off the bat. If it turns out that the first thing he/she tests for is in fact the cause of the symptom, he/she is not going to then run the other 19 tests, just for fun.
LE took stickies of GSR from wherever in the truck they found what they *believed to be* GSR. The test reports on those have not yet been provided as evidence, as far as I am aware. It could be that none of them were GSR, or all of them were GSR, or some of them were GSR, we don't know that yet. However, the Crown in opening statement told us that,
"Significant amounts of gunshot residue were found on the inside of the truck, with especially high concentrations in the front seat area, both passenger side ceiling and driver’s side ceiling."
so, from that, I would expect that once that evidence is presented, it should match what the Crown stated.
LE took samples from wherever in the truck they found what they *believed to be* blood, according to preliminary tests. The test reports on those samples have not yet been disclosed to the jury, as far as I am aware. Once those reports are provided to the jury, we will know whether any of them matched up to TB. However, I would expect the results to match what was stated in the Crown's opening statement,
"Further forensic examination found the blood DNA of Tim Bosma on the inside of the truck in various areas, including the inside rear passenger door; rear passenger armrest; around the glove box; and front passenger cup holder (front or rear?).
Tim Bosma’s blood was also found in various areas on the undercarriage of the truck."
"Further forensic examination of the Eliminator found blood on the main hatch area of the vault. It was Tim Bosma’s blood."