To be fair, a lot of us had (until now) admired TD's straightforwardness and ability to actually ask some coherent questions.
DM's defense's approach has been to 1) point out that DM didn't hide any of the murder evidence (oh, okay then, he must be innocent), 2) point out that DM is rich, 3) ask DM's friends if they're nervous over and over. If they actually did stuff that seemed to have a point, or was less inherently contradictory (often making their own client look worse, for example), we'd likely make fun of them less.
Also, welcome to WS.