IT is the same tweet by the same reporter from early today. The only one that has reported this and not one of the main reporters in this case.
Maybe Alex Pierson hasn't been coughing into her sleeve...
IT is the same tweet by the same reporter from early today. The only one that has reported this and not one of the main reporters in this case.
IT is the same tweet by the same reporter from early today. The only one that has reported this and not one of the main reporters in this case.
I agree with "intelligent" .... I will even go so far as to say she will be acquitted on accessory charges if she sticks to the same story(s) ....
--- it is plausible for her to think the DVR was a stereo
--- it is plausible for her to help DM check the locks on the trailer (thus fingerprints or whatever)
--- it is plausible for her (and even MB) to believe DM had a "mothers day present" in the trailer .... thus a bit of "secrecy" .... DM had even mentioned in a letter he wanted to buy MB a Tesla Car
--- it is plausible she would put on gloves to help move industrial equipment (incinerator)
--- it is plausible she would accept DM moved the incinerator because of the creaky second story wooden floors in the barn
--- it is plausible DM would try to conceal the incinerator in the trees to prevent somebody from stealing it (aah the irony)
Whether she is telling the truth or not is beside the point ..... between the crown and CN ... CN wins this round !!!!
Only thing I can think of if she obeyed DM's letters and tried to influence witnesses it could be construed as helping DM get away with murder .... however I doubt that too .... because her charge was in regard to what she did on May 9th when the trailer was moved
I was sitting in today. The judge did not say anything to the jury along the lines of her being protected in other murder trials. He told them that what she says in her testimony in the TB trial against DM and MS cannot be held against her in her own trial in the TB case, where she is being charged as accessory after the fact. The only way it can be used is if she perjures herself. She is protected under the Evidence Act.
It looks like both (to me) in her sexy shoes and barf/unclassy comments. I bet her bf is quite pleased. What a ...*I agree. I don't think that she cares to protect him at all but only herself.
I agree with "intelligent" .... I will even go so far as to say she will be acquitted on accessory charges if she sticks to the same story(s) ....
--- it is plausible for her to think the DVR was a stereo
--- it is plausible for her to help DM check the locks on the trailer (thus fingerprints or whatever)
--- it is plausible for her (and even MB) to believe DM had a "mothers day present" in the trailer .... thus a bit of "secrecy" .... DM had even mentioned in a letter he wanted to buy MB a Tesla Car
--- it is plausible she would put on gloves to help move industrial equipment (incinerator)
--- it is plausible she would accept DM moved the incinerator because of the creaky second story wooden floors in the barn
--- it is plausible DM would try to conceal the incinerator in the trees to prevent somebody from stealing it (aah the irony)
Whether she is telling the truth or not is beside the point ..... between the crown and CN ... CN wins this round !!!!
Only thing I can think of if she obeyed DM's letters and tried to influence witnesses it could be construed as helping DM get away with murder .... however I doubt that too .... because her charge was in regard to what she did on May 9th when the trailer was moved
Great observations.
I'm now wondering if the charges against her were just a scare tactic by LE for her belligerence. They might have known they really had nothing on her that would stick, but did it because she was being difficult and to try intimidate her into saying more.
I'm also now thinking that if the rest of her testimony goes as today, the Crown may wind up withdrawing charges before her trial even though she still has not been cooperative. She may have been counselled by her lawyer to believe the charges against her are a pure bluff.
Great observations.
I'm now wondering if the charges against her were just a scare tactic by LE for her belligerence. They might have known they really had nothing on her that would stick, but did it because she was being difficult and to try intimidate her into saying more.
I'm also now thinking that if the rest of her testimony goes as today, the Crown may wind up withdrawing charges before her trial even though she still has not been cooperative. She may have been counselled by her lawyer to believe the charges against her are a pure bluff.
It looks like both (to me) in her sexy shoes and barf/unclassy comments. I bet her bf is quite pleased. What a ...*
Absolutely. It was very frustrating to watch. At first I thought she really did have no knowledge of the incident, I thought maybe DM was trying to protect her but I do believe she's lying through her teeth.michelle, did you find CN as snippy and evasive as the tweets suggested?
I dont think the charges are a bluff maybe a threat of them in the beginning were to try get her to talk but she called the bluff. The police gradually waited and slowly built their case. There is obviously enough evidence to support charges and go to trial.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Absolutely. It was very frustrating to watch. At first I thought she really did have no knowledge of the incident, I thought maybe DM was trying to protect her but I do believe she's lying through her teeth.
<rsbm>
In order for her to carry out his instruction, she would have to know specifics of who knew what (in order to know who "he" was), and she could only know that if he had previously discussed the details with her.
Unfortunately not, sorry. I did read tweets that he was looking at her/they made eye contact.Do you have any idea of how DM was reacting at all while she was on the stand?
I don't agree on a couple of counts.
The "Mother's day present" was brainstormed as an idea between CN and MB after DM's arrest, she said.
It's hard to believe that creaky floorboards would be such an urgent issue that DM would drive at night to solve it. Why not address that when he first discovered the floorboards were creaky when he moved the incinerator in there? Why a midnight mission?