I would not want to be the jury trying to sort out the argument Pillay made about the 9:05 and 9:15 truck sightings on the Super Sucker video. His argument is that the video time stamp was not 3 hours off, but 3 hours and 10 minutes off. If that was the case, a couple of facts fit more neatly. If his argument is correct:
-DM and MS pass by the Super Sucker on the way to TB's at about 8:56. Super Sucker is about 2 minutes drive from TB's.
-Arrive about two minutes later about 8:58 and park in the field, walk over to TB's and make contact by phone and arrive about 9:05
-Talk for a few minutes and leave for test drive, seen again on Super Sucker video at 9:15
-Seen again at 9:25 heading back to Yukon in field
-Arrive in field, pick up Yukon and both vehicles seen again at 9:30 on Super Sucker video
-Arrive at Bobcat roughly 19 minutes later at 9:49 as seen on Bobcat video. This is the correct drive time direct from Super Sucker to Bobcat.
-In this scenario you have to believe that both Super Sucker manager and police officer who testified video was 3 hours off missed the extra 10 minutes. Officer said he checked it against his iPhone time, manager against his watch. Officer had no notes that said he checked it against phone, just that it was 3 hours off. Manager could not say when he had his watch serviced, but it was one minute off the time on a court computer.
If Crown/MS argument is correct:
-Yukon first passes Super Sucker at 8:46 pm and could have arrived near Tim's 2 minutes later. The accused don't arrive in the driveway until 9:05 leaving almost 20 minutes to find the field, park and walk over to the Bosma's which has been estimated to be a 5-7 minute walk. In this scenario there has to be some kind of delay in either finding the field, parking in it or leaving the Yukon to walk over.
-Leave the Bosma's after several minutes of discussion, go directly to field, drop off Mark, leave together and be seen on Super Sucker video at about 9:20.
-Take some kind of route or drive in some kind of circumstance that adds 10 minutes to what would be the direct route from Super Sucker to Bobcat
I find this a really tough call. The Bobcat stop seems to have little purpose in a scenario where Tim has already lost his life, unless they just booked it with a plan to stop and catch their breath, change plates etc. so they could get away from the scene. You'd have to believe both the police officer and the Super Sucker manager who called himself a stickler for time missed the 10 minutes and just rounded off to three hours off in a situation where both would clearly be expected to understand the key importance of precision. But the Pillay timeline fits much more neatly with no delays necessary either between the Super Sucker and the Bosma's or the Super Sucker and the Bobcat. I'm glad I'm just babbling on WS in this instance and not a jury member. Truly don't know how I'd call this. Hopefully maybe they have a bit more clarity in the courtroom. The Crown would have had no particular investment in either scenario, and clearly just went with the one that matched the time as reported by LE and Super Sucker management.
-DM and MS pass by the Super Sucker on the way to TB's at about 8:56. Super Sucker is about 2 minutes drive from TB's.
-Arrive about two minutes later about 8:58 and park in the field, walk over to TB's and make contact by phone and arrive about 9:05
-Talk for a few minutes and leave for test drive, seen again on Super Sucker video at 9:15
-Seen again at 9:25 heading back to Yukon in field
-Arrive in field, pick up Yukon and both vehicles seen again at 9:30 on Super Sucker video
-Arrive at Bobcat roughly 19 minutes later at 9:49 as seen on Bobcat video. This is the correct drive time direct from Super Sucker to Bobcat.
-In this scenario you have to believe that both Super Sucker manager and police officer who testified video was 3 hours off missed the extra 10 minutes. Officer said he checked it against his iPhone time, manager against his watch. Officer had no notes that said he checked it against phone, just that it was 3 hours off. Manager could not say when he had his watch serviced, but it was one minute off the time on a court computer.
If Crown/MS argument is correct:
-Yukon first passes Super Sucker at 8:46 pm and could have arrived near Tim's 2 minutes later. The accused don't arrive in the driveway until 9:05 leaving almost 20 minutes to find the field, park and walk over to the Bosma's which has been estimated to be a 5-7 minute walk. In this scenario there has to be some kind of delay in either finding the field, parking in it or leaving the Yukon to walk over.
-Leave the Bosma's after several minutes of discussion, go directly to field, drop off Mark, leave together and be seen on Super Sucker video at about 9:20.
-Take some kind of route or drive in some kind of circumstance that adds 10 minutes to what would be the direct route from Super Sucker to Bobcat
I find this a really tough call. The Bobcat stop seems to have little purpose in a scenario where Tim has already lost his life, unless they just booked it with a plan to stop and catch their breath, change plates etc. so they could get away from the scene. You'd have to believe both the police officer and the Super Sucker manager who called himself a stickler for time missed the 10 minutes and just rounded off to three hours off in a situation where both would clearly be expected to understand the key importance of precision. But the Pillay timeline fits much more neatly with no delays necessary either between the Super Sucker and the Bosma's or the Super Sucker and the Bobcat. I'm glad I'm just babbling on WS in this instance and not a jury member. Truly don't know how I'd call this. Hopefully maybe they have a bit more clarity in the courtroom. The Crown would have had no particular investment in either scenario, and clearly just went with the one that matched the time as reported by LE and Super Sucker management.