Hi Dexter,
Cheers for the response. We disagree and that is a good thing as it is making us both think,
I'm not going to respond to your thoughts on LE being judgemental, as I reckon we are saying the same thing. (It is what they do.)
Do you buy the $36M Lawsuit stuff? Was every Police officer bought into that? I don't think so. The reason is because as a convicted felon, it would have been less. So here is something MAM let's people easily forget....... Avery was not jailed for a total of 18 years for a crime he did not commit. Six of those years were for the crime of threatening someone with a gun. The wrongful rape conviction was horrendous and he deserves our sympathy for that, but set that aside and he was going to be sent to prison anyway.
I question some of the evidence and the way it was presented in the docuseries, but not what I have learned from my own research. Forget Kratz and his views. The makers of MAM left a ton of stuff out of the series.
I'll say this though, yes, it is clear the Police did not do the finest job of building the case for the prosecution. I do not think there was any evidence planting, but if you start with respect for their positions as Law Enforcement Officers, then by means fair or foul, you would what them to get the real culprits.
A girl went missing and was last known to be at Avery Salvage. Someone there knows what happened. The police speak to all who lived there and discovered there were lies being told. It is a coincidence that there was a lawsuit going on. Convenient for all sides to use to their advantage. The evidence gathering looks hooky as the story took so long to come out after the initial lies.
MAM was a great watch though my friend. It had me screaming at the TV, but then the good lady pointed out I was not hearing the full story and my research during nights of insomnia began.
We disagree, and if we are honest, there are only two people who know the truth about what really happened. It's just that I do not believe either of them.