I wish you'd make up your mind on this issue.
One minute nobody was duped cause its BDI and that's why they wouldn't indict, next minute they were all duped except Kolar, the minute after that you say it has to be PDI if its not BDI, then you say there's no evidence to indicate PDI but then say all the evidence says PDI so this is why its BDI!
singularity,
The case is BDI with an official cover up. Kolar is only reporting what is legally allowed, hence his silence during the CBS documentary.
There is an outside possibility that its PDI, but it looks vanishingly small, for Patsy to make so many ridiculous mistakes in a homicide case is an obvious red line indicator.
You can only go with the evidence, if that shows Patsy at the scene of the crime then maybe its PDI, or was she staging for Burke Ramsey?
I'm thinking if Patsy or John were staging for themselves then the staging would be better, i.e. no size-12's, no long johns, no pineappple snack residue, no flashlight. Things would sync into place.
Consider they had all night to dream up a staging scenario yet the one presented looks like a last minute addition, only the ransom note looks laboured, but with Patsy's literary skills the outline could have been done in minutes.
So you have to think did the parents arrive last on the scene? Did BR do all his nasty stuff before they attended, well its possible, so BDI as per Kolar is on the cards.
So it could be PDI or JDI as there is no smoking gun, and unless you have writen a book saying PDI, it looks very much as if the case is BDI?
.