I agree with you here,
Userid. I don't buy John's innocence prior to BPD showing up. I don't know all of Kolar's reasoning, but he tells us two reasons that he (like Steve Thomas) thinks John wasn't aware of what happened until just before noon. One reason alone could be more easily discounted. But with two, they both (Kolar and Thomas) gave it more credence.
They both thought Arndt's description of the change in John's demeanor after having lost track of him was significant. Then add to that the statement reported by his future son-in-law that John told them he had found JonBenét at 11:00 am, and they both felt that it was then that he had his epiphany and figured out what had happened. Kolar felt that John figured out that
Burke was responsible, and Thomas felt that John figured out that
Patsy was responsible.
(I know.) I don't agree with either conclusion; but then, I don't agree with other things in Kolar's or Thomas' theory either.
The following is from Kolar's
AMA:
[]
FrankieHellis 9 points 2 years ago
Do you believe he had not known it was down there before this discovery?
[]
jameskolar[
F,
S] 16 points 2 years ago
An evaluation of the statement made by John, which I considered to be a spontaneous utterance that formed criminal culpability, suggests that he was not aware that her body was downstairs until he went roaming after the 1000 am ransom failed to come.
He became an accessory to crime when he failed to tell Det. Arndt that he had discovered the body. His beeline to the basement later with Fleet was thought to be a ruse.
Arndt had her hands full with the house packed with friends, and with Patsy, who was extremely distraught, puking and crying..
[]
FrankieHellis 12 points 2 years ago
This makes no sense though. If he didn't know where the body was then he wasn't part of it. If he wasn't part of it, then why would he cover for family members who were? Wouldn't he assume it had been an intruder?
[]
jameskolar[
F,
S] 17 points 2 years ago
Think it through. What reason would he have to cover for family, and if he did, wouldn't he then become an accessory after the fact?
The changing story line of his statements over the following months was indicative of deception.
If he recognized Patsy's handwriting, and her 'turn of phrase' in the ransom note, why would he think there was an intruder involved?
[]
pantherplane 3 points 2 years ago*
Why would John not call 911 then? Being described as "calm" and cordial it seems he would opposed to the "hysterical" Patsy.
[]
jameskolar[
F,
S] 11 points 2 years ago
Good question. I suspect that he was trying very hard to make sense of the ransom note and told her to go ahead and call police while he studied it.
[]
ElectricGypsy 2 points 2 years ago
I wish I could give you 1000 points for this post!!!
[]
FrankieHellis 2 points 2 years ago
Thank you!
[]
pantherplane 4 points 2 years ago
What about John being heard in the 911 call?
[]
jameskolar[
F,
S] 8 points 2 years ago
There is no disputing that he was nearby. He was on his hands and knees in the hallway outside the kitchen examining the ransom note when Patsy called 911
[]
got-gum[
F]
(C'est moi.) 3 points 2 years ago
But that is according to the Ramseys' account. According to them he was still in his underwear reading the note. But from the end of the 911 call until Ofc. French arrived (less than 7 minutes), they claim he ran up the stairs (two flights), got dressed, looked in on Burke, searched briefly for JonBenet, and then got back to the first floor just inside the front door hallway to be seen by Ofc. French when he walked in the door. (No mention that I know of about his being out of breath.)
[]
jameskolar[
F,
S] 6 points 2 years ago
I know, many unanswered questions about the events of that night and morning.