WestieMom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
- Messages
- 286
- Reaction score
- 412
Maybe not a girl.
Prosecutors press conf. said female.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Maybe not a girl.
I agree. After looking at the charging document, it looks like the charges are listed in the same order as the age of the victim. The names are partially redacted, but not enough if you ask me. Also, there is a specific time frame that is covered for the lewd acts on or about 11/16/2012 through and including 11/15/2013.
I know the link has been posted previously, but you can view the document here: http://www.riverside.courts.ca.gov/media/Turpin Complaint.pdf.
Agreed so much, I'm on the autistic spectrum myself and find it really annoying that autism is the current excuse of choice for evil people to try to mitigate their crimes, as it gives a bad name to all autistic people. That's bad enough, but seeing people here assuming it without any particular evidence is even worse, as it starts to feel like everyone's thinking autism = evil, which is absolutely not the case - I for one am following this case with as much horror as everyone else.
This man might well be socially awkward, but that's about the only trait that's been mentioned so far - what little we know of him could be all kinds of things, so it'd be nice to see less of the assumption that he has one particular condition over every other possibility.
Perhaps a “School Rate”. :maddening::maddening:
I have an awful feeling that there are some missing children, and that those family photos were smoke and mirrors to stop extended family from figuring out who was who. If they were having a baby roughly every 18 months and sending out photos every three or four years, it would maybe have been possible to shuffle the kids along in sequence.
Of course, we could find that the Turpins privately sent regular individual photos of each child to family members and these images are not available to the public, but all we have seen are these group shots. Even in the "Thing" photo where the kids are identified by number, we can see that they aren't matched chronologically correctly. None of the older kids look the correct biological age.
A pair of short sighted grandparents who are determined to trust their god-fearing son would not be suspicious or puzzled. But medical tests, testimony from the kids and careful matching of birth certificates to living children might reveal some missing kids.
it worked for me
I agree. After looking at the charging document, it looks like the charges are listed in the same order as the age of the victim. The names are partially redacted, but not enough if you ask me. Also, there is a specific time frame that is covered for the lewd acts on or about 11/16/2012 through and including 11/15/2013.
I know the link has been posted previously, but you can view the document here: http://www.riverside.courts.ca.gov/media/Turpin Complaint.pdf.
Was he trying to look like Peter Pan? That hairstyle is so bizarre!
The journaling really throws me, well many things do, but allowing the kids to journal, so weird. I assume the parents read the journals? Did the kids write about their abuse? Anyone have any insight to this aspect of the case?
This link isn’t working for me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's interesting. Try this one and then select the very first link about the complaint http://www.riverside.courts.ca.gov/media/high-interest-cases.shtml
Maybe not a girl.
Personally I dont think David was/is on the Autism spectrum or else he would not have made it through engineering school.
Personally I don’t think David was/is on the Autism spectrum or else he would not have made it through engineering school.
Engineers are a breed of a different world! They are not like you and I, their brains think in a total different pattern. It does not matter their age or experience-engineers have the same persona. There is no gray, everything is black or white, no sitting on the fence. They must be accurate in their work so that carries over into their life. Everything in the house, or their world, has a specific place! Everything is done on a strict schedule. They are not social people. It’s not because they don’t know how, it’s just not part of their nature.
.
The mother looks stick thin and likely anorexic. The younger two children also look too thin. Look how mother-Louise-next child stand with their arms - just like Louise's children were taught to stand for photos. Grandma had food issues, passed to Louise, passed to Louise's children.
These kids should not be separated as I think they have been looking after each other. The older ones would be like mom to the younger ones.
It was one of the girls. The published doc with the charges filed didnt do a great job at disguising the names of the victims. It isnt the 17 year old either. Jmo
I agree. After looking at the charging document, it looks like the charges are listed in the same order as the age of the victim. The names are partially redacted, but not enough if you ask me. Also, there is a specific time frame that is covered for the lewd acts on or about 11/16/2012 through and including 11/15/2013.
I know the link has been posted previously, but you can view the document here: http://www.riverside.courts.ca.gov/media/Turpin Complaint.pdf.