CA CA- 5400 block of La Sierra Avenue, Riverside, Baby Jane Doe, found in plastic bag im dumpster, Oct '87, - Melissa Jean Allen Avila, 55, arrest '24

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

dotr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
53,088
Reaction score
151,956
'In October 1987, the body of a newborn baby was found in a plastic bag inside of a Riverside, California garbage dumpster. The dumpster was situated behind a business in the 5400 block of La Sierra Avenue in Riverside, which is located approximately 50 miles east of Los Angeles in California's Inland Empire area. A man rummaging for recyclables found the baby girl, whose death was ruled a homicide by the Riverside County Coroner’s Office. At the time, Riverside Police Homicide Detectives worked diligently to solve the case, but all leads were exhausted, and a suspect was not identified'.

'' Othram assisted with investigators' reference testing efforts using KinSNP® Rapid Familial Relationship Testing, which allows investigators to infer kinship in closely and distantly related individuals. These efforts led to the identification and arrest of the infant's mother, 55-year-old Melissa Jean Allen Avila. Avila was 19-years-old at the time of the baby’s death. Detectives do not believe the infant’s father had any criminal culpability in the murder.''
 
This 2023 article is about a different case where a baby was found in 2022. The biological mother of Baby Doe 1987 that was just identified by Othram is named Melissa Jean Allen Avila.
Thank you!, erased my post
 
'In October 1987, the body of a newborn baby was found in a plastic bag inside of a Riverside, California garbage dumpster. The dumpster was situated behind a business in the 5400 block of La Sierra Avenue in Riverside, which is located approximately 50 miles east of Los Angeles in California's Inland Empire area. A man rummaging for recyclables found the baby girl, whose death was ruled a homicide by the Riverside County Coroner’s Office. At the time, Riverside Police Homicide Detectives worked diligently to solve the case, but all leads were exhausted, and a suspect was not identified'.

'' Othram assisted with investigators' reference testing efforts using KinSNP® Rapid Familial Relationship Testing, which allows investigators to infer kinship in closely and distantly related individuals. These efforts led to the identification and arrest of the infant's mother, 55-year-old Melissa Jean Allen Avila. Avila was 19-years-old at the time of the baby’s death. Detectives do not believe the infant’s father had any criminal culpability in the murder.''
BBM: "Detectives do not believe the infant’s father had any criminal culpability in the murder."

A 19 year old mother who could not cope with the birth of a baby made a bad decision. The father of the baby, who could not cope with a baby, has no criminal culpability. But - what was his decision: to abandon the mother, or to raise the child? How is culpability decided?

It sounds like the assumption is that the father is not culpable because he was not present during the birth. Did he make a choice to be an absent father? Is he culpable?

She was 19 years old when the baby was born in 1987. She was born in 1968. The Feminist Revolution was in full swing with rights to govern childbirth. There was no where to leave an unwanted child. There are better social services today.
 
Did he make a choice to be an absent father? Is he culpable?
She was 19 years old when the baby was born in 1987. She was born in 1968. The Feminist Revolution was in full swing with rights to govern childbirth. There was no where to leave an unwanted child. There are better social services today.

Quote RSBM.

People have been leaving babies on doorsteps or inside churchs or near hospitals for generations. Tied up in a dumpster is never okay.
I agree the father is morally culpable, if he was aware of the pregnancy. He should be ashamed of his non-involvement. But they will say, He didn't break the law...
 
Quote RSBM.

People have been leaving babies on doorsteps or inside churchs or near hospitals for generations. Tied up in a dumpster is never okay.
I agree the father is morally culpable, if he was aware of the pregnancy. He should be ashamed of his non-involvement. But they will say, He didn't break the law...

Imo, even if he wasn't aware of the pregnancy, he is still culpable. He is the male sperm donor and as such, has the responsibility to see that any live birth that results from his action is in a safe place to be born. Men have to be equally responsible. Why do we continue to allow them to walk away from a potential pregnancy? We don't even know if the mother was mentally stable. How does he take advantage of that for his own sexual satisfaction and then throw up his hands with a "gee, I didn't know".
 
Imo, even if he wasn't aware of the pregnancy, he is still culpable. He is the male sperm donor and as such, has the responsibility to see that any live birth that results from his action is in a safe place to be born. Men have to be equally responsible. Why do we continue to allow them to walk away from a potential pregnancy? We don't even know if the mother was mentally stable. How does he take advantage of that for his own sexual satisfaction and then throw up his hands with a "gee, I didn't know".
What if he never knew about the pregnancy?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
1,952
Total visitors
2,074

Forum statistics

Threads
601,681
Messages
18,128,265
Members
231,125
Latest member
subzero55
Back
Top