Hmmm... I just can't get my mind of this case. I don't follow crime investigations usually, so maybe some things that strike me as odd are reasonably common in cases like this. But there are just so many bizare things going on about this - I am in now way sure which theroy I would believe, but I just felt like sumarizing the things that keep going around my head:
-) We have a young woman who takes a longer trip through several cities on her own, with the intended final destination being an organic farm. From her tumblr we know that she had psychological problems of some extent and from what an alleged friend of her on reddit said, she has already "disapeared" in some way once before (although obviously that is not confirmed). However, to me, her final posts sound very optimistic... shortly before departing she says something to the likes of "life is difficult but there are moments that make it worth it". So for me, a planned suicide seems the least likely. Her tone just sounded too optimistic, she was aware of her problems but seemed to be willing to try to overcome them. I do think she was likely stressed out though - she posts about getting lost at the airport and missing one of her flights at the start of her trip - just a few days before she dissapeared.
-) The impression I get about her personality (again, from reading her tumblr... i know that this only shows what she wanted to show) is that she seems to have trusted strangers very easily. She mentions her crush in December or January, that errupted very quickly and ended just as fast. She also once mentions a tendency to talk too much and too loudly as being a problem of hers. This seems to fit what [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8923299&postcount=4"]Archivist[/ame] mentions on page 1 - the day she dissapeared, she was seen talking to strangers inside a bookstore.
I wouldn't jump to the conclusion it had anything to do with what happened to her, but being in her troubled state of mind and in a seedy neighbourhood, i doubt it was a beneficial trait.
-) I keep thinking through reasons for her to get into the tank on her own, voluntarily, and drowning in a tragic accident. But i doubt it. In the few pictures of the tanks that aren't aerial, but from the perspective of a human standing on the roof, these things look huge, so not very inviting to be climbed, and could be anything (for example, gas tanks for heating or whatever). If we are to assume she vanished at night (which could be just speculation of me), they would probably be even less appealing to be explored, because I imagine a service roof would only be lit very little at night. And if something happened during daylight, I'd still have a hard time believing that a stranger to the building (unless having studied engineering) would safely identify them as water tanks.
-) I am also wondering what the police wanted to achieve by releasing the elevator video... I would guess if they did it to find out if other Hotel Guests noticed her behaviour that night, the could have just aproached them directly? Am I forgetting something that might explain why they released it?
-) The number of peculiar people whe have in the vicinity. A bunch of sex offenders nearby, the slitwrist-video person (although I never did see the video, so I have no idea about him other than what you guys said) who deleted his video a few days ago (although that could obviously simply be because he didn't want to be tasteless) and then the "reporter" who is also a sex offender. I wouldn't really suspect most of these people (including the reporter) to be killers or anything, simply because of their age... I'd be surprised if they could somehow murder her and get her in the tank (if thats even what happened) although anything is possible at this point.
Having strange figures hang around a place such as this is probably nothing unusual, and its no wonder that they - just like all of us - are interested in this case. Still, the sheer amount of them somehow puts me off.
-) The most recent bit that irritated me were the events from the start of this thread. If Im reading it right, we first have a News Station saying, police says, currently no foul play is suspected. They even gave the name of a Police Officer saying so. Which means either they made it all up, or someone from the inside talked without permission, because only minutes later there came the statement from the official LAPD spokesperson denying any change of the case status. The
link to the original news story about there being no foul play now points to a different article, which is a shame because I was about to read it again to check who they claim to be there source and see if I can find anything on the web about him. --Edit: Okay, forget that, link works (again?) and
Tim Marcia definitly is a real detective of LAPD, for whatever thats worth -- The contradicting news certainly seems odd to me, but then again, might just be media speculation as it is common with high profile cases.
So all in all, theres alot of things I wouldn't call uncommon by themselves, but there is just so damn much of it, which leads to me being creeped out.
I know this post wasn't too productive, alot of text and no new infos or theories, but I just felt like summing up what strikes me so much about all of this. Hope nobody minds my rambling!