Oh, I am certain that they do!
There have been court cases where they have showed them to juries.
Usually as proof the defendant was not capable of the crime for which they were accused of.
If GSK doesn't want his photographed, then I believe he is under endowed.
(A certain teletubby name comes to mind)
Moo
http://www.nydailynews.com/amp/news...t-penis-small-crimes-lawyer-article-1.2825186
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I know I'm somewhat of a skeptic but I'm a professional nurse, and have seen all there is to see and then some. Tissue atrophies ( shrinks and droops) with age. SERIOUSLY, it is a medical problem with men sometimes.
Whatever endowment size which a man has at age 25-35, even 45 and 55 in the way of endowment is definitely not going to BE the same or photograph the same way at age 72.. add in the tranquilizers we think he's been on, the fear of having one's genitals photographed for a nationally publicized serial killer and rapist spree ( and burglary but not sure it comes into play there) likely long and complicated trial or trials. What they are going to end up with, IF this is to try to prohibit photography, will be a total travesty compared to what he MAY have looked like in his 20's to even 50's.
It's worlds apart and I don't think this is what the motion to prevent further testing is about.
IF his attorney wanted to make a valid argument that he was not endowed with a penis capable of penetration of a rape victim, then urologists for the prosecution are going to be all over that like crazy.
Conversely, IF the prosecution tries to introduce physical evidence victims may have given statements about size 40 years ago, if he has a good or even AVERAGE attorney at trial, the defense is going to have very good Urologists with photos and probably even silicone models to show what age does to connective tissues and underlying muscles and blood vessels and nerves.
This is truly a speculative barking up the wrong tree and any medical professional would know thus. Whatever witnesses may have seen 30 years ago is not the same today, not in any way, anatomically.
Gravity is a real b****!
I hate the creeping SOB more than there are words, but hatred doesn't keep me from stating the atrophy which occurs with ALL tissue in advanced aging.
Also, I want to make it clear that I was a very discreet and compassionate nurse. We did NOT stand around and talk about any patient's bodies except as a body part might have needed professional nursing care or treatment. Sometimes, those of us with more experience doing procedures would help the less experienced nurses. We did see body parts, but only as necessary for either sex.
Much of the time, we RNs had to do the catheterizations on male patients, and there were some male patients in this guy's age range that even the Urologists could not get a Foley catheter in after we were unsuccessful and had to call the specialist to ICU to help.
It happened a lot more than the gen. public would ever think, and most of the time it was not due to a prostate problem but the angle we needed to work with to enter the bladder wasn't " there".
I mean to educate, not embarrass with what I've related here. ALL of us age, all of us WILL age, God willing we live long enough. Women have our own set of body challenges but we have more help with the prone to saggy bits with hormone replacement therapy, Spanx, good bras.. and the women who get everything nipped, tucked, lifted and lipo-sucked.( shudders)