Thanks for sharing your experience. Mine is limited: two cousins and two friends' sons with it. One is so heavily medicated he's basically non-functional, one is in and out of jail and hallucinates but not dangerous, two are adopted (different families in different states) but show signs of RAD and bipolar and schizophrenia and who knows what else and are dangerous on an irregular basis to their very loving and gentle-but-firm families, and have had to be institutionalized but their parents can't keep them there forever and are quite concerned about what they might do once they're no longer minors and/or if they ever get their hands on a gun.
My conclusion from my very limited experience (and researching school shooters) has been that people who become psychotically violent are often schizophrenic and bipolar, but those who are schizophrenic and/or bipolar are very rarely violent. (I do have another cousin, a grandmother, and a neighbor who are bipolar without schizo. The man is occasionally violent (suicidal and also threatened to kill his wife multiple times); one of the women is in and out of jail and either abusing everyone close to her or genuinely loving them; the other, before her death, was the same but without the jail part. She was very narcissistic. She reminds me a *lot* of the jekyll/hyde personality that I sorta see in Jen.
I'm no kind of expert. Just an observer.
It's that last bit that I'm wondering about, specifically in the last 18 months of her life. I was stunned when they said the Safeway pic was her; she had looked very much the same from the time she was a little girl in that pic in the recent article till now, consistently over decades, but suddenly she looks like a totally different person, unkempt, overweight, not even facially very similar. Almost no one saw them in that last 18 months, including their "intimate friends." What happened in that time period?
You're a very good friend to care so much to learn about it like that. And I agree with all the rest, too.
Especially when you consider the rule of thumb that your house shouldn't cost more than 3x your income. If we assume 53k and add the 1900/mo, that's still only a $225k house if you don't want to be over-stretched, and I'm 90% certain I read that the WA house was in the mid 300s.