CA - Jonathan Gerrish, Ellen Chung, daughter, 1 & dog, suspicious death hiking area, Aug 2021 #4

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
There's a little problem with that assumption.

I looked into most popular hiking trail apps for android device (I"m assuming he had an android based smartphone because he worked as an engineer for Google android team,

there's NOT a single app (top 5 downloaded on the list) that lists Hite Cove trail, which is closest to their new house as you mentioned, in any search result, and Savage Lundy trail is even worse, a non-existing trail in probably all of trail apps.

Were they carrying a paper map and decided to take on a more adventurous hiking?
I wish there's some kind of evidence or proof to that supposition.
Apologies for my ignorance but how has it been determined that Jon used the Alltrails app to research the HCTrail when his phone is currently inaccessible? Are you able to track his account without having access to his phone?
 
Thank you and I would most certainly agree with you if that was my intention. Would you take a dog and your 12 month old child?
Not sure what you mean when you say "if that was my intention". I hike for enjoyment, a big part of that is picking a hike that would be fun at the time. I would enjoy hiking along that river and going for a swim, and I'd be interested in wildflower season. I wouldn't enjoy either of those trails this time of year, they're burned, barren and boring, even before considering the heat. I would take my dog on a cool spring day when wildflowers were blooming and the creeks running. Probably not a baby, even in those conditions, too far, too steep, too much sun, and a one year old would need to get out and play. We did take our dog and our baby on a 5 day backpacking trip in the Emigrant Wilderness, mid 80's. We hiked from lake to lake, swimming and fishing, taking our time. See photo. I'll include a photo from an 8 mile hike with 2000' of elevation gain, with grandma and our dog. That was late May, with the marine layer keeping the climb cool. Oat Hill Mine Trail, Calistoga, beautiful views. Wouldn't do that on a hot day though, wouldn't be fun. I'll throw in a photo of the view from the top, though a November hike. So I have experience similar to what happened in this case, which is why it got my attention and interest.
 

Attachments

  • 1-IMG_3915.JPG
    1-IMG_3915.JPG
    155.5 KB · Views: 77
  • 1-P1120627.JPG
    1-P1120627.JPG
    471.3 KB · Views: 77
  • 1-IMG_5058.JPG
    1-IMG_5058.JPG
    317.6 KB · Views: 59
Not sure what you mean when you say "if that was my intention". I hike for enjoyment, a big part of that is picking a hike that would be fun at the time. I would enjoy hiking along that river and going for a swim, and I'd be interested in wildflower season. I wouldn't enjoy either of those trails this time of year, they're burned, barren and boring, even before considering the heat. I would take my dog on a cool spring day when wildflowers were blooming and the creeks running. Probably not a baby, even in those conditions, too far, too steep, too much sun, and a one year old would need to get out and play. We did take our dog and our baby on a 5 day backpacking trip in the Emigrant Wilderness, mid 80's. We hiked from lake to lake, swimming and fishing, taking our time. See photo. I'll include a photo from an 8 mile hike with 2000' of elevation gain, with grandma and our dog. That was late May, with the marine layer keeping the climb cool. Oat Hill Mine Trail, Calistoga, beautiful views. Wouldn't do that on a hot day though, wouldn't be fun. I'll throw in a photo of the view from the top, though a November hike. So I have experience similar to what happened in this case, which is why it got my attention and interest.
Thank you for sharing your experiences - that’s exactly why I don’t believe Jon and Ellen would have taken the route that has been suggested. There is no evidence they intended to go on a ‘day hike’ as reported in the media. That was a suggestion made by a ‘friend of Jon’s’ who was also speculating on their intentions based on information he’d been given. He hadn’t been informed that was their intention. Nobody had - otherwise they would have been more concerned when they didn’t return on Sunday.
 
Not sure what you mean when you say "if that was my intention". I hike for enjoyment, a big part of that is picking a hike that would be fun at the time. I would enjoy hiking along that river and going for a swim, and I'd be interested in wildflower season. I wouldn't enjoy either of those trails this time of year, they're burned, barren and boring, even before considering the heat. I would take my dog on a cool spring day when wildflowers were blooming and the creeks running. Probably not a baby, even in those conditions, too far, too steep, too much sun, and a one year old would need to get out and play. We did take our dog and our baby on a 5 day backpacking trip in the Emigrant Wilderness, mid 80's. We hiked from lake to lake, swimming and fishing, taking our time. See photo. I'll include a photo from an 8 mile hike with 2000' of elevation gain, with grandma and our dog. That was late May, with the marine layer keeping the climb cool. Oat Hill Mine Trail, Calistoga, beautiful views. Wouldn't do that on a hot day though, wouldn't be fun. I'll throw in a photo of the view from the top, though a November hike. So I have experience similar to what happened in this case, which is why it got my attention and interest.
Fantastic photos
 
@Pumphouse363 I appreciate having you here. You bring an immediacy and human element to this story. If you are citing the report of a "friend of Jon's" you'll need to provide the source (news article) or at least allude to where or when the story came out. If it's something you know, that's when you have to be a Verified Insider. I've never been a VI so I don't know the process. But there was a case a few months ago about an experienced trail runner Philip Kreycik who went missing near Berkeley. His trail running buddy, who had been with Kreycik the night before he disappeared and who ran with him often, became a Verified Insider. This man became a thoughtful and welcome addition to this thread on Kreycik. In that case, no one could believe that PK ran in heat on an empty trail, and then vanished. But he did. He died of heatstroke within hours and wasn't found for two weeks.

A lot of people agree with you here about the family not taking the long route or taking a full-day's hike, in their opinions and based on what they know of the family.
 
If you note on this occasion it says a relative reported them missing, in other reports it says the nanny reported them missing and yet others state it was Rosanna Heaslett who informed LE - that’s why I’m reluctant to become a verified contributor because the written word often gets distorted and misinterpreted.
 
@Pumphouse363 I appreciate having you here. You bring an immediacy and human element to this story. If you are citing the report of a "friend of Jon's" you'll need to provide the source (news article) or at least allude to where or when the story came out. If it's something you know, that's when you have to be a Verified Insider. I've never been a VI so I don't know the process. But there was a case a few months ago about an experienced trail runner Philip Kreycik who went missing near Berkeley. His trail running buddy, who had been with Kreycik the night before he disappeared and who ran with him often, became a Verified Insider. This man became a thoughtful and welcome addition to this thread on Kreycik. In that case, no one could believe that PK ran in heat on an empty trail, and then vanished. But he did. He died of heatstroke within hours and wasn't found for two weeks.

A lot of people agree with you here about the family not taking the long route or taking a full-day's hike, in their opinions and based on what they know of the family.
It is an awfully sad story about Philip and I don’t want to diminish the gravity of the tragedy if his death - but he didn’t take his wife snd children on the run with him. That would have been as ridiculous as Jon taking Ellen, Miju and Oski on the SL trail MOO
 
If you note on this occasion it says a relative reported them missing, in other reports it says the nanny reported them missing and yet others state it was Rosanna Heaslett who informed LE - that’s why I’m reluctant to become a verified contributor because the written word often gets distorted and misinterpreted.

Were they living at their new house near the trail yet or still at their house in Darrah? While the SF Chronic mentions the new house, one SF Chron article (not sure if same article or two) shows a picture of their house in Darrah and talks to a next door neighbor, and says something about living there and also using it as an airbnb.
 
Ms Betsy, how do we know they actually went for a hike at all? I know this question seems strange, but what other evidence was there that placed them at ANY other points (on any of the potential routes they could've taken) other than where their bodies were found?

Were their footprints found all along the trail?

Their bodies were discovered approximately 1.5miles from where their vehicle was parked. The same vehicle was spotted by eyewitnesses en route to the trail head, but it was purely the vehicle that was positively identified, not the occupants within it...

MOO
That level of detail hasn't been made public, all the sheriff said is that tracks consistent with a couple and dog were found going down the Hites Cove Trail, and the initial search party went down that way to look for them. The bodies were found 1.5 miles from their truck, down Savage Lundy, a steep trail. The investigators spent a lot of time processing the scene, I'm sure they looked at tracks and it would be obvious if any kind of vehicle had gone down that trail. I don't see how the family could get there any other way than walking, nor could anyone else have been there without leaving tracks. They had only a small amount of water left, not likely they used it all in 1.5 miles, so most likely they were on the way up. MOO.
 
Lightning & Statistics?
....Personally, I.... ruled lightning out because I'd read that, statistically, only 10% of those struck by lightning die as a result. I thought the odds of it taking all four of them simply too unbelievable....
@Newsjunkiejen sbm for focus bbm Thx for your post and lightning statistics. I have no theory about what happened but see the 10% fatality figure differently from your initial theory (unbelievable all 4 would die of lightning). Maybe one died of lightning, others of heatstroke??? IDK.

Is it possible imo that not-all-four were struck & not-all-four died of lightning, but a strike snowballed, leading to deaths of all four? For ex:
If lightning struck both Mom & Dad and killed them, weren't baby & dog also doomed to dying by heatstroke (or heat-related something-or-other, <--- technical medical term)?
If lightning struck both Mom & Dad, incapacitating/leaving one or both unable to walk for say, a couple hours, if others waited, weren't they doomed to heatstroke?
If lightning struck Dad or Mom carrying Baby, would lightning energy also injure or kill Baby? Either babe in arms, or babe in carrier w conductive metal components?

Seems possible imo lightning injured or killed only one but indirectly led to deaths of the others. my2ct could be wrong.
 
Thank you for sharing your experiences - that’s exactly why I don’t believe Jon and Ellen would have taken the route that has been suggested. There is no evidence they intended to go on a ‘day hike’ as reported in the media. That was a suggestion made by a ‘friend of Jon’s’ who was also speculating on their intentions based on information he’d been given. He hadn’t been informed that was their intention. Nobody had - otherwise they would have been more concerned when they didn’t return on Sunday.
I'm not wedded to the idea that they did the loop hike, that is purely based on the report that their tracks went down the Hites Cove Trail, while their bodies were found on the Savage Lundy Trail. Conceivably, they could have gone a short distance down the HCT for the view, returned to their truck, and then then gone down the SLT. Surely LE knows those details. I think carrying a camelback water bladder and the baby in a carrier is consistent with going on a day hike. How else would they get 1.5 miles down a steep trail? You were right about the initial missing person report coming from the friend, not the nanny or RE agent, with the info you provided I confirmed it in news reports. You said a helicopter found them, but the Chronicle article says "About 1.5 miles down the switchbacks, around 11 a.m. Tuesday, the team found the family in the middle of the trail." That article has been the most detailed source of info I've found, maybe you could read it and correct any errors you see.
 
Lightning & Statistics?
@Newsjunkiejen sbm for focus bbm Thx for your post and lightning statistics. I have no theory about what happened but see the 10% fatality figure differently from your initial theory (unbelievable all 4 would die of lightning). Maybe one died of lightning, others of heatstroke??? IDK.

Is it possible imo that not-all-four were struck & not-all-four died of lightning, but a strike snowballed, leading to deaths of all four? For ex:
If lightning struck both Mom & Dad and killed them, weren't baby & dog also doomed to dying by heatstroke (or heat-related something-or-other, <--- technical medical term)?
If lightning struck both Mom & Dad, incapacitating/leaving one or both unable to walk for say, a couple hours, if others waited, weren't they doomed to heatstroke?
If lightning struck Dad or Mom carrying Baby, would lightning energy also injure or kill Baby? Either babe in arms, or babe in carrier w conductive metal components?

Seems possible imo lightning injured or killed only one but indirectly led to deaths of the others. my2ct could be wrong.

I think that would certainly be a plausible scenario that the lightning strike almost had a domino effect and triggered a series of events that J & E would've had no control over if they had indeed been killed by the initial strike.

Also, that is true about the baby carrier - I can't envision a point where either parent wouldn't have had baby in the carrier on their back. In this instance it seems that it would be virtually impossible for the parent carrying the baby to have succumbed to a lightning strike but the baby be unscathed.

I think we'd maybe have to assume that if whichever parent was carrying baby was killed by lightning, it's likely that baby was sadly killed in the same strike.

MOO
 
I believe you can, and I have in the past, if you state clearly it is your opinion only, and if it does not involve direct criticism of LE or the victim or blame the victim-- which includes the victim causing the event.

Thanks @MrsEmmaPeel - I'll bear that in mind for future posts. On this occasion I was trying to clarify what I thought another poster was hypothesising/suggesting in terms of a possible new theory.

MOO
 
Welcome, @Pumphouse363 ! It’s great to have you on these threads. I’m not sure if you’ve made it to the first thread yet, but there was some speculation there that JG and EC were in possession of a new baby backpack, given EC’s IG post (no longer available). Much of my own speculation about this tragedy hinges on that backpack being new (which, of course, I could be completely wrong about).

MOO:
Lots of folks with new gear like to try it out. Especially if one is purchasing that gear for some upcoming adventure (e.g. wearing a new pair of walking shoes everywhere in advance of a trip to Europe in order to avoid getting uncomfortable blisters on the planned trip). But it’s not necessary to even have an upcoming event planned. Sometimes, new gear just calls for a new adventure.

If JG and EC had, in fact, recently purchased a new backpack carrier, probably with a sun shade, and if they wanted to try it out, a parent would likely research a trail nearby, possibly one which would really test that equipment. A parent would also check the weather forecast and plan a trip during the time of day when the forecast suggests good conditions. Parents would discuss the trip, pack for eventualities, and consult each other on possible routes, length of hike, etc. Tacitly, parents would think about things like whether both were in good shape, had experienced hikes in similar environments/conditions, had first aid/red cross experience, were aware of potential dangers (toxic algae, storm warnings, cell phone coverage, etc.). Planning and precautions would be undertaken. Some, maybe even many, might ditch the idea altogether. We all know on these threads that Savage/Lundy is difficult to get good information about. But there is some information. What might one find with half an hour or so of researching?

All of this is to say that even with good intentions, planning, researching, and preparing, something could go wrong. A sprained ankle? A sick dog? A last minute decision not to soak in the water, based on how it looks? A last minute decision to soak in the water to hike up the switchbacks in cooling clothes? Any of these could have led to a catastrophic sequence of events.

I have thick skin, so if you want to pick this post apart, or if I have inadvertently misrepresented anything, I welcome the criticism. What has drawn me to this tragedy is that I can easily see myself and my dh in this situation. It doesn’t matter to me whether I am right or wrong, ultimately. I have learned so much and have had so much to reflect on, and I am grateful for that. I wish your friends were still with you.
 
Apologies for my ignorance but how has it been determined that Jon used the Alltrails app to research the HCTrail when his phone is currently inaccessible? Are you able to track his account without having access to his phone?
Someone found his AllTrails account early on. Several of Jon's hikes were recorded there previously up until June 2021. It's been an assumption (as far as I know) that he used this app but I have not seen this explicitly stated that this is what LE referred to for him researching the trail. He has accounts on some other apps but none show any activity.

He had a paid, aka AllTrails Pro, account so it may have functionality for privacy settings etc.and info that I can't access from a free account. AllTrails has a rather confusing, at least to me, hierarchy of (1) Maps and Lists, and also (2) Activities and "Completed" hikes. You can download maps, make lists, and mark hikes as "completed" but it's not clear one would have actually hiked them to do so. Jon marked the Hites Cove Trail as completed. It's not clear when he did that and the trail of this name in AllTrails is actually the trail that descends from 140 on the other side of the river from the Savage-Lundy trail. In AllTrails the Hites Cove Road trail is actually the road leading up to where the truck was parked. Beyond there the ohv trail down to the river isn't in AllTrails and neither is the Savage-Lundy trail.

On the other hand, "activities" in AllTrails seem to be actual hikes that were recorded by the app. He hadn't recorded any since May 18, at least not ones that are viewable to the public.

So he could well have done research or downloaded a map from another source. Or LE may have misinterpreted what they found at AllTrails, or he may have downloaded a map with AllTrails set to private viewing.
ETA: my own opinion only
 
Thank you for sharing your experiences - that’s exactly why I don’t believe Jon and Ellen would have taken the route that has been suggested. There is no evidence they intended to go on a ‘day hike’ as reported in the media. That was a suggestion made by a ‘friend of Jon’s’ who was also speculating on their intentions based on information he’d been given. He hadn’t been informed that was their intention. Nobody had - otherwise they would have been more concerned when they didn’t return on Sunday.

I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong here, but wasn't there a social media post (Instagram, I believe), before they set out on their hike showing an image of their backpack?

I'm just thinking on your point above (BBM) about there being no evidence that a day hike was there intention.

Are you meaning that there's nothing to indicate they planned to make a full day of it? or rather that there's no evidence to show that they had intended to hike AT ALL that day? Or something else?

MOO
 
Lightning & Statistics?
@Newsjunkiejen sbm for focus bbm Thx for your post and lightning statistics. I have no theory about what happened but see the 10% fatality figure differently from your initial theory (unbelievable all 4 would die of lightning). Maybe one died of lightning, others of heatstroke??? IDK.

Is it possible imo that not-all-four were struck & not-all-four died of lightning, but a strike snowballed, leading to deaths of all four? For ex:
If lightning struck both Mom & Dad and killed them, weren't baby & dog also doomed to dying by heatstroke (or heat-related something-or-other, <--- technical medical term)?
If lightning struck both Mom & Dad, incapacitating/leaving one or both unable to walk for say, a couple hours, if others waited, weren't they doomed to heatstroke?
If lightning struck Dad or Mom carrying Baby, would lightning energy also injure or kill Baby? Either babe in arms, or babe in carrier w conductive metal components?

Seems possible imo lightning injured or killed only one but indirectly led to deaths of the others. my2ct could be wrong.
The evidence of possible lightning that has been posted is impressive sleuthing. I still discount that possibility, here's my reasoning, obviously just my own opinion. @SpideySense showed good evidence of lightning at some point, 25 miles away, and clouds over the trail at some point that day, also @Blackkettle . Maybe there was lightning on the Savage Lundy trail too. Maybe at the same time and place where the family was. Maybe it was a special kind of lightning that strikes people 100' apart. Though not common, maybe it killed both adults. Maybe it left no marks or signs at the scene or that would show up in an autopsy. In my experience, that's too many maybes, with each maybe it becomes less likely. Compare that with heat stroke. It was unquestionably hot and there was no shade, and it was a steep climb to the truck. The adults and dog were all affected by those conditions, being 100' apart would make zero difference. They had only a small amount of water left, and were still about 1000' below and 1.5 miles from the truck. It does not surprise me that they all died in those conditions. MOO.
 
Thank you for sharing your experiences - that’s exactly why I don’t believe Jon and Ellen would have taken the route that has been suggested. There is no evidence they intended to go on a ‘day hike’ as reported in the media. That was a suggestion made by a ‘friend of Jon’s’ who was also speculating on their intentions based on information he’d been given. He hadn’t been informed that was their intention. Nobody had - otherwise they would have been more concerned when they didn’t return on Sunday.

I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong here, but wasn't there a social media post (Instagram, I believe), before they set out on their hike showing an image of their backpack?

I'm just thinking on your point above (BBM) about there being no evidence that a day hike was there intention.

Are you meaning that there's nothing to indicate they planned to make a full day of it? or rather that there's no evidence to show that they had intended to hike AT ALL that day? Or something else?
Welcome, @Pumphouse363 ! It’s great to have you on these threads. I’m not sure if you’ve made it to the first thread yet, but there was some speculation there that JG and EC were in possession of a new baby backpack, given EC’s IG post (no longer available). Much of my own speculation about this tragedy hinges on that backpack being new (which, of course, I could be completely wrong about).

MOO:
Lots of folks with new gear like to try it out. Especially if one is purchasing that gear for some upcoming adventure (e.g. wearing a new pair of walking shoes everywhere in advance of a trip to Europe in order to avoid getting uncomfortable blisters on the planned trip). But it’s not necessary to even have an upcoming event planned. Sometimes, new gear just calls for a new adventure.

If JG and EC had, in fact, recently purchased a new backpack carrier, probably with a sun shade, and if they wanted to try it out, a parent would likely research a trail nearby, possibly one which would really test that equipment. A parent would also check the weather forecast and plan a trip during the time of day when the forecast suggests good conditions. Parents would discuss the trip, pack for eventualities, and consult each other on possible routes, length of hike, etc. Tacitly, parents would think about things like whether both were in good shape, had experienced hikes in similar environments/conditions, had first aid/red cross experience, were aware of potential dangers (toxic algae, storm warnings, cell phone coverage, etc.). Planning and precautions would be undertaken. Some, maybe even many, might ditch the idea altogether. We all know on these threads that Savage/Lundy is difficult to get good information about. But there is some information. What might one find with half an hour or so of researching?

All of this is to say that even with good intentions, planning, researching, and preparing, something could go wrong. A sprained ankle? A sick dog? A last minute decision not to soak in the water, based on how it looks? A last minute decision to soak in the water to hike up the switchbacks in cooling clothes? Any of these could have led to a catastrophic sequence of events.

I have thick skin, so if you want to pick this post apart, or if I have inadvertently misrepresented anything, I welcome the criticism. What has drawn me to this tragedy is that I can easily see myself and my dh in this situation. It doesn’t matter to me whether I am right or wrong, ultimately. I have learned so much and have had so much to reflect on, and I am grateful for that. I wish your friends were still with you.

This is a very thoughtful post, Parsnip

Also, thanks for confirming what I thought I'd read on here, which was the social media post on the new backpack.

MOO
 
The evidence of possible lightning that has been posted is impressive sleuthing. I still discount that possibility, here's my reasoning, obviously just my own opinion. @SpideySense showed good evidence of lightning at some point, 25 miles away, and clouds over the trail at some point that day, also @Blackkettle . Maybe there was lightning on the Savage Lundy trail too. Maybe at the same time and place where the family was. Maybe it was a special kind of lightning that strikes people 100' apart. Though not common, maybe it killed both adults. Maybe it left no marks or signs at the scene or that would show up in an autopsy. In my experience, that's too many maybes, with each maybe it becomes less likely. Compare that with heat stroke. It was unquestionably hot and there was no shade, and it was a steep climb to the truck. The adults and dog were all affected by those conditions, being 100' apart would make zero difference. They had only a small amount of water left, and were still about 1000' below and 1.5 miles from the truck. It does not surprise me that they all died in those conditions. MOO.

All of your reasoning here makes perfect sense to me, but it begs the question (and a few other WS contributors have wondered this also).. IF everything is pointing to heat exhaustion and it is becoming the most obvious thing (Occam's Razor), then why are LE seemingly so hesitant to say so?

Previous cases have been settled as COD caused by heat exhaustion far faster than this, and I get that they're still waiting for toxicology reports, but is there something else that's holding them back from just going down the 'obvious' heat stroke conclusion?

MOO
 
That level of detail hasn't been made public, all the sheriff said is that tracks consistent with a couple and dog were found going down the Hites Cove Trail, and the initial search party went down that way to look for them. The bodies were found 1.5 miles from their truck, down Savage Lundy, a steep trail. The investigators spent a lot of time processing the scene, I'm sure they looked at tracks and it would be obvious if any kind of vehicle had gone down that trail. I don't see how the family could get there any other way than walking, nor could anyone else have been there without leaving tracks. They had only a small amount of water left, not likely they used it all in 1.5 miles, so most likely they were on the way up. MOO.
Someone found his AllTrails account early on. Several of Jon's hikes were recorded there previously up until June 2021. It's been an assumption (as far as I know) that he used this app but I have not seen this explicitly stated that this is what LE referred to for him researching the trail. He has accounts on some other apps but none show any activity.

He had a paid, aka AllTrails Pro, account so it may have functionality for privacy settings etc.and info that I can't access from a free account. AllTrails has a rather confusing, at least to me, hierarchy of (1) Maps and Lists, and also (2) Activities and "Completed" hikes. You can download maps, make lists, and mark hikes as "completed" but it's not clear one would have actually hiked them to do so. Jon marked the Hites Cove Trail as completed. It's not clear when he did that and the trail of this name in AllTrails is actually the trail that descends from 140 on the other side of the river from the Savage-Lundy trail. In AllTrails the Hites Cove Road trail is actually the road leading up to where the truck was parked. Beyond there the ohv trail down to the river isn't in AllTrails and neither is the Savage-Lundy trail.

On the other hand, "activities" in AllTrails seem to be actual hikes that were recorded by the app. He hadn't recorded any since May 18, at least not ones that are viewable to the public.

So he could well have done research or downloaded a map from another source. Or LE may have misinterpreted what they found at AllTrails, or he may have downloaded a map with AllTrails set to private viewing.
ETA: my own opinion only
Thank you for your kind response. I also checked his alltrails account and have done so over the course of several years. The first time he researched the HC trail was over four years ago and another about a year ago. I just wondered why it was assumed he’d taken that route on that day as I can’t find any evidence of anyone saying that. So why would LE have a ‘hunch’ that they’d hiked there when they were reported missing at 11pm on Monday? Just because they’d bought a property on Hites Cove Road?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
72
Guests online
176
Total visitors
248

Forum statistics

Threads
609,329
Messages
18,252,724
Members
234,625
Latest member
XtraGuacPlz
Back
Top