TheDuchess
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 2,325
- Reaction score
- 604
Here's one reason why I don't think the brother did it:
IF* the brother is guilty, he would've gotten blood all over his clothes. Now, we can assume that he wasn't wearing bloody clothes when LE arrived. Now, did the brother wash the clothes before calling 911? The timeline doesn't allow that. Did he just hide the clothes in his room? And wouldn't LE find the clothes? But when the parents arrive home, they are going to know that he is wearing different clothes from when they left, and they are going to start asking questions. Also, something like this doesn't happen in a vacuum. If your daughter is found stabbed, and your son has shown violent tendencies, you are going to start to suspect him. The fact that the parents still have the brother talking to LE, had a memorial service with the brother in attendance tells me they don't suspect their son at all. And I don't think parents could be that oblivious.
Another issue is I think a 12-year-old boy who kills his sister and tries to blame it on an intruder is going to stage the scene differently than how it would really look. For example, I could see a real intruder not caring about blood splatter and not bothering (or having time) to clean it up. But a 12-year-old boy might figure that he needs to wipe down every space of the crime scene because anything could lead back to him. So I don't know what the crime scene looked like...but I think there would be a difference depending on who did it, and LE would be able to tell.
OK-now that is what I was trying to say yesterday, but you said it much better.
I would also like to add the fact that they have recovered foreign DNA from the crime scene that they are trying to match to the other suspect/non-supect.