LinasK
Verified insider- Mark Dribin case
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 27,004
- Reaction score
- 25,569
Surely if she went to the beach she would have been picked up by cameras
Whose cameras?
Surely if she went to the beach she would have been picked up by cameras
So she did live AT the Tannery WITH her mother? For some reason earlier, I thought she lived in the nearby apartments. Children are allowed to live at the center?
Or surely this morning when people arrived at the beach they would see tracks, trails from her scooter, her scooter or her helmet somewhere, right? The beach just doesn't work out in my mind. Maybe that is because the beach would mean so dire an outcome and I'm in denial
ETA Wait ... is the beach the same beach the boardwalk amusement park is on ?
ETAA Or when they say dogs followed her scent to the beach , do they mean the river bed? Which is dry , right?
Whose cameras?
"Deputy Chief Steve Clark said the case doesnt meet the criteria to issue a statewide amber alert.
Surveillance video showed Madyson by the mailboxes at 5:05 p.m. by the living spaces near the trails by the San Lorenzo River. The Tannery sits between the river and Highway 9.
Among the groups searching are folks from Take Back Santa Cruz, a standup paddleboarding group and a group from Watsonville."
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/ge...-residents-search-for-missing-8-year-old-girl
a nationally known non-profit developer of affordable space for artists and arts organizations. In addition to the residential lofts, the community transformed five historic tannery buildings into studio space for Santa Cruz artists.
https://jscotannery.com/
I am still wondering about the playdate and the mom who called to say MM was 'missing.'
I just don't believe that she would go down to the beach alone if she had the option of being with her friend, instead. IME, 8 yr olds LOVE to be with their friends and would wait around and try to make it happen. I wonder why she scooted away and why the friends mother knew she 'was missing.'
This makes a lot more sense. All of the buildings are considered " tannery'' . Her mom was at the ' arts center' perhaps when Maddy visited her but all on the same property. Or at least, I think that's what I'm reading. Right?
I think it's not that the friends mother knew she was missing. I think Maddy's mother communicated with the friends mother and realized she wasn't there with her friend. That's how I read it anyway. Like maybe the friends mother called to ask why Maddy hadn't arrived.
Dunno. These details always take a while to come out. I agree she might have been lured away.
[video=twitter;625688447496384512]https://twitter.com/ktvu/status/625688447496384512[/video]
Yes, she did. Dogs followed Maddy's scent to the beach.
Are they referring to the "beach area" on the river bank or that actual beach (pacific ocean)?
It's hard to look at for me wondering what could have ensued shortly thereafter. Just terrifying.Oh GOD! Don't you just want to reach into that photo and pull her back??
Please let this child be found. Children should be able to play outside freely but unfortunately they cannot. I cringe when I hear a young child goes missing while out playing alone. Predators are called so for a reason and wait for opportunities where no eyes are watching. Most young kids are physically at a disadvantage and usually not equipped with cell phones or devices to communicate their location.
I would love for my little one to have the freedom to play without me having to be there but it's not that way anymore. Even with Stanger Danger classes by local police - I don't feel secure in letting her walk around the neighborhood alone or to from the bus stop... and I'm in a development where I know who lives in each house but its easy for someone to drive around and wait.
I hope more clues to her whereabout appear today - footage from cameras?? a witness, etc. Upthread someone mentioned custody and I'm wondering if anything has been documented about the marital status of her parents ?