Lilibet
Southern Oregon
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 19,737
- Reaction score
- 82,811
If it helps, I understood your OP perfectly. There was nothing unclear about it.
BBM
BBM
As I said in my original post, I was not making excuses!
I was not saying that HE wouldn't know it's cruel. What I was pointing out, is that some cultures would not view certain things as cruelty...and perhaps his mom would not have viewed that as a warning sign. If you don't think it's cruelty, there is no reason to find it troubling. (And that's just a possibility. I'm not suggesting it's really what happened.) Having spent a lot of time in the Philippines, I could see a parent thinking nothing of many actions against an animal, that would cause major red flags to you or I.
Anyway, I'm just making a suggestion about cultural differences. I felt like some insinuation about the mom not doing anything to stop this were being made, especially after the dog story. I feel like there is a big temptation to jump on the parents and blame them. But he was living in a supportive, loving, and accepting group of people. He was being fed positivity by his community. He was not a discarded kid who had no one to listen to him or understand him. I actually think he's old enough to be squarely blamed for his actions. I personally do think some cultural differences might have impeded the ability to see warning signs, but that's JMO. I'm moving on from the animal suggestion, because it's taken way differently than I meant (Or I just worded poorly to imply something I didn't mean.) It's really not all that relevant anyway, since we know so little about the dog situation.