avalonisland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2018
- Messages
- 223
- Reaction score
- 1,172
Who has LE ruled out as a suspect in the killing of Tristan Beaudette? IMO, interesting no names mentioned 3 weeks post homicide!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In reading it I saw something I missed the first time. The original victim was given STITCHES without an x-ray or anything.
Later he said pellets started oozing out. Of where? I'm very creeped out. How did they come out when the skin was stitched shut?
Isn't he lucky he didn't get a massive infection?
What the heck?
I think you'll remember that way upthread, an ER nurse and I (EMT) both posted that x-rays are SOP to prevent exactly this from happening. You don't close a wound in a hospital setting without being certain that there are no foreign bodies or other detritus.
When there is something inside a wound, it will usually work its way out as a wound heals. If the skin is closed, it will push up under the skin, sometimes popping out, other times needing to be removed. An example of this would be glass or metal fragments from a shattered window or a vehicle accident or bits of sand/gravel from a road accident like a fall from a bike.
Infections can happen - this will alert you sooner to the presence of foreign matter - but not necessarily.
The LASD Homicide Bureau is based in Monterey Park, which is a community east of downtown. This group handles homicide investigations for all of LASD.
Who has LE ruled out as a suspect in the killing of Tristan Beaudette? IMO, interesting no names mentioned 3 weeks post homicide!
...very clean campsite except IMO the one pair of shoes not neatly placed IMO almost like maybe someone other than victim placed them?
I think you'll remember that way upthread, an ER nurse and I (EMT) both posted that x-rays are SOP to prevent exactly this from happening. You don't close a wound in a hospital setting without being certain that there are no foreign bodies or other detritus.
When there is something inside a wound, it will usually work its way out as a wound heals. If the skin is closed, it will push up under the skin, sometimes popping out, other times needing to be removed. An example of this would be glass or metal fragments from a shattered window or a vehicle accident or bits of sand/gravel from a road accident like a fall from a bike.
Infections can happen - this will alert you sooner to the presence of foreign matter - but not necessarily.
I'm not sure we should make much out of the shoes askew. For starters, if that's the victim's tent, the BIL could have kicked a shoe and created disarray when he found the victim. Also, it's not always easy to line up your shoes when you get into your tent and don't want to get sand in the tent. If you're going to leave them outside, you go butt first through the door and take them off while your feet are still outside.
No relevance to citing any car-bicycle campground injuries in the last year IMO.This is getting off-topic, however...
Could you maybe cite some car-bicycle campground injuries in the last year?
Like everything else outdoors, there are risks. Risks notwithstanding, campgrounds are busy with kids on bicycles. Car-camping drivers know this.
——
Could you maybe cite some car-bicycle campground injuries in the last year?,,,
Also, #49 and #51 were both clearly occupied by a variety of things. That may be the point of the way the cars are parked. And, no, campers don’t back into other people’s campsites. They back into the loop road.
To remind you of what James Roger’s wound looked like and the CBS report the photo is from:
After father's mysterious slaying at campsite, stories emerge of past shooting incidents
True, but there are tens of thousands of people in Los Angles area with those same core personality traits. Granted, he is the only one who is known to have manifested those traits at the Park in a noticeable way. At the same time, simply possessing those traits and being known to frequent the park just does not move him way up on my radar.
Add other known traits like: violent tendencies, tendency to confront others regarding “his” park, confrontational with rangers about regulations / earlier shooting occurred shortly after confrontations etc and that is a different story.
Thanks.
Counting all sources, my guess is that only a small number of people either order the maps via mail, or buy one "off the shelf" at a hiking / outdoor store. It might be worth checking to see who purchased the maps. Maybe one of the purchasers has other concerns as well.
As a side note, I only knew of one independent store in San Diego county and one in Orange county that stocked USGS maps for SOCAL areas. There were probably a few others in LA. Some of the chain outdoor stores probably do it now. Even still, the number of "off the shelf" sources would be small and map purchases few. Maybe a buyer for the Malibu park area creeped out an employee for some reason.
That would be really unhinged. But it's possible. Sometimes people get so fixated on their one issue that they totally lose track of reality.
I don't know enough about how LASD usually handles these things to know whether there's anything unusual about this case. I guess most likely the only thing they're hiding is how little they know
Reward offered in Malibu Creek shooting
The Malibu City Council approved a $5,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the person or persons responsible for murdering Tristan Beaudette. The council approved the reward at its July 9 meeting.
(Kudos to Ian Bradley at The Acorn for staying on this story.)
This would be along the lines also of an unhinged developer who wants people to be too scared to use the park. That was the first guess of someone I spoke with who lives in the area.
e
It's interesting that it's so low. With all the money they've raised, and they themselves were successful financially that they wouldn't make it higher to hopefully flush someone out. Is this normal?
Probably IMO car drove into campsite, someone exited drive side, maybe passenger side as well. Did what was goal to do, then bac in car and exit the heck out to the campground.
If a vehicle was involved, they would have had to enter prior to 10:00PM, with a previously booked camping site reservation, to stay overnight.
I don't think the shooter would drive the vehicle into the park, that doesn't seem to make sense if one wants to keep a low profile. There is plenty of room around the park to park a vehicle and walk into the park from what I understand. I tend to think it might be walk able distance to the shooters house (or bike as mentioned).
I thought the trailer park mentioned sounds interesting. It seems like that would be walkable, is close to the Tapia Park area and the campground, and when entering the side street to the temple (with the trailer park right behind it) it would be pretty hidden. It doesn't look like there are any street lights on this side street. It is literally located right after passing the temple. It looks like it has some sort of official recreation and conservation building across the street from it. Any word in Malibu that this blue dude community was to be removed maybe for some park building or maintenance office or something? Something like that could have sparked anger towards the park itself I guess.
Edit: This theory would not address the seasonality of the crimes (assuming they are connected) though since these homes seem to be purchased (and/or rented?) . If somebody was angry about something park related I feel like it would have escalated faster. There would be no reason to wait almost a full year between incidences and then escalate like that. There has to be some sort of seasonal aspect to the shooters locality in this area or his anger or both.