gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,421
- Reaction score
- 230,534
I am quite confused by this post.
This is what I understand it says:
If you're a SoCal upper-middle class yuppie Bernster you wouldn't be toting a gun or afraid of wildlife in the dark. And only SoCal upper-middle class non-gun-toter yuppie Bernsters get outdoors in this area. So, the shooting of the wildlife biologist couldn't have been an accident.
Unless if maybe it happened in the vicinity of the Grapevine or northwards; then the likelihood of it's being an accident increases dramatically.
My scenario was more about human nature than political inclination:
200 feet from the road? Let me propose a gun-toter who pulled off by the road for a pee and thought he was about to get attacked by an animal, so he shot at where the sound was coming from (the unfortunate wildlife biologist), not being able to see clearly 'n all. Thankfully, no animal attack ensued, so he hauled up trow, jumped back into his vehicle, and with a squeal of tires, got the heck out of there. Shaking all over: animals in the dark, attacking animals, big animals, wild animals, mountain lions coyotes, bears, anything that makes a rustling noise when he can't tell what it is, scare the heck out of him. Whew!
I'll bet the wildlife biologist's hammock was black, dark brown, or dark green.
I rarely use absolutes.
There aren't a lot of people in this area that are toting guns while pulling over to pee because they're terrified of wild animals.
I feel like that would have to be a lot of coincidences for the latest scenario you're proposing to make sense as an accident:
1. A wildlife biologist is sleeping in a dark colored hammock near a road, outside a campground.
2. A car happens to pull over exactly where he is because the occupant has to pee.
3. The person who has to pee conveniently has a loaded shotgun in their vehicle.
4. The person happens to be terrified of wild animals (but still pulls over on a dark road instead of driving about 5-10 minutes either direction to civilization. And instead of peeing right next to the car, he or she inexplicably walks several yards into the dark, away from the road).
5. The person exits their vehicle with a loaded shotgun which they pump/prime to get ready to shot.
6. Despite the fact that this is a relatively quiet area with gravel/dirt roads and not a lot of development, the biologist doesn't hear the car approach, nor the person open their car door, or walk up or pump their shotgun. He hears nothing until the blast.
7. The person with the shotgun has it ready to go in one hand while peeing or getting ready to pee but suddenly hears a small sound and in the dark night is able to accurately shoot downward at the exact location of the apparently crouching animal.
8. The person who accidentally shot the man thinking he was an animal, hears nothing indicating a human was shot -no cry or yell. Or they ignore it and flee to their car that somehow the victim doesn't hear leaving the scene.
It doesn't make sense to me.
Whoever shot that man likely had to be on foot and got close, quietly, before shooting and quietly running away.
I think they probably know the area well.
Last edited: