CA CA - Maya Millete, 39, missed daughter's birthday, Chula Vista, 7 Jan 2021 #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wanna know the truth about the fridge!!! I watched Chris live the other night and when that question came up...I literally sat straight up! I’ve been racking my brain about how the fridge is a part of this, or is it at all? I totally agree w anyone who thinks something happened to May on Thursday night. Everyday I ask God to please let today be the day that May is found. At this point, I think we all agree that she would not leave her kids, family, or her beautiful life. I am super happy and grateful Chris M. told Maricris and Richard that he will be getting some resources together for them to help in the search! I feel that this is going to be instrumental in locating May. AND, did y’all catch that Chris was asked if he was privy to inside information since he is retired frm San Diego PD? He gave a little grin and said he could be. Obviously he knows better than to share anything he shouldn’t, but good to know. And why no statement from LM’s lawyer thus far? Chris made it seem like that was odd. All MOO of course.
WHERE IS MAY??? LORD, PLEASE LET TODAY BE THE DAY!!!❤️
BBM
Yes! And remember, LM said that he heard her in the kitchen Friday night. I don't necessarily believe that but I do think he had to make an excuse for something in the kitchen.
 
Speculating! My problem with the new info on the argument:
Maricris said he took son on Fri morning to prevent Maya taking the boy on trip, LM got uninvited/didn't want to go. This trip to beach was to make her feel bad, if I can't go you are not taking my son either like scenario.

But I wonder, did anyone in the family know about him not going? Because if let's say they argue and she gets hurt before Letting the relatives know, then why go away on Fri? Apart from taking her body away from home, what else would that help with? he'd know the girls would be home alone. But if he did take body on Fri morning why not open door to brother and go with she ran away on Thursday? Then bedroom must have had clues and no time cleaning up?
Also if he didn't do anything then coming home why not worry? In that scenario he was behaving childishly taking one child to wind up wife after argument, calmed down with clear head and as he didn't get the results hoped (MM taking only the girls and feeling guilty imo). He would have rubbed it under her nose imo. I can't believe he wouldn't open that door for brother if he didn't have anything to hide.
All MOO.
 
Speculating! My problem with the new info on the argument:
Maricris said he took son on Fri morning to prevent Maya taking the boy on trip, LM got uninvited/didn't want to go. This trip to beach was to make her feel bad, if I can't go you are not taking my son either like scenario.

But I wonder, did anyone in the family know about him not going? Because if let's say they argue and she gets hurt before Letting the relatives know, then why go away on Fri? Apart from taking her body away from home, what else would that help with? he'd know the girls would be home alone. But if he did take body on Fri morning why not open door to brother and go with she ran away on Thursday? Then bedroom must have had clues and no time cleaning up?
Also if he didn't do anything then coming home why not worry? In that scenario he was behaving childishly taking one child to wind up wife after argument, calmed down with clear head and as he didn't get the results hoped (MM taking only the girls and feeling guilty imo). He would have rubbed it under her nose imo. I can't believe he wouldn't open that door for brother if he didn't have anything to hide.
All MOO.
 
What if something happened to Maya on Thursday night, later explained away as kitchen sounds, rustling, making herself a meal, when in reality there was a scuffle? That was heard by everyone upstairs.

We have no indication by ANYONE that she was accounted for on Friday....

Since no one is named a POI, let's pretend for the sake of argument, that the husband and children were upstairs, all equally hearing rustling sounds below, and an intruder accosted Maya, left with her body, backtracking only to slip upstairs and lock her bedroom door...

So everybody thought Maya was in her bedroom. All night, all the next day.....

Sounds like a presplain to me.

What you heard downstairs, that was just mommy making sandwiches, all by herself.

If there's a suspect fridge door, possibly another presplain. Cops did it.

What we know might be vastly than what young children are led to believe.

Maya might've left on foot after dark, that's why she's not seen on any security cams. More presplain.

If I thought my spouse walked away after dark, that's where I'd start searching....

IMO we aren't getting facts, we're getting explanations. Much like in the missing Suzanne case.

Deja vu.

JMO

Yes. You make a good point. Everything Larry says is just his side of the story. It could be true or it could be false or it could be what I believe and that's a mixture of both. Even pathological liars who tend to lie about the weirdest things will tell the truth sometimes.

Hearing but not seeing her is not, in my opinion, witnessing anything. All it does is confuse the timeline. It's possible the rustling could be anything. My house makes weird noises all the time and sometimes I think someone is there when they're not.

And just for the sake of argument, maybe she was rustling around downstairs. Maybe she was locked in the room and unable to get out or make noise other than some form of rustling.

That's definitely not what I believe and just an opinion, but it is possible if you just take Larry's words and his timeline into consideration. You make a good point. My personal belief is that nobody could account for her on Friday because whatever did happen, happened around the time of the argument on Thursday. But we wouldn't be good sleuths if we didn't look at all the possibilities.
 
Speculating! My problem with the new info on the argument:
Maricris said he took son on Fri morning to prevent Maya taking the boy on trip, LM got uninvited/didn't want to go. This trip to beach was to make her feel bad, if I can't go you are not taking my son either like scenario.

But I wonder, did anyone in the family know about him not going? Because if let's say they argue and she gets hurt before Letting the relatives know, then why go away on Fri? Apart from taking her body away from home, what else would that help with? he'd know the girls would be home alone. But if he did take body on Fri morning why not open door to brother and go with she ran away on Thursday? Then bedroom must have had clues and no time cleaning up?
Also if he didn't do anything then coming home why not worry? In that scenario he was behaving childishly taking one child to wind up wife after argument, calmed down with clear head and as he didn't get the results hoped (MM taking only the girls and feeling guilty imo). He would have rubbed it under her nose imo. I can't believe he wouldn't open that door for brother if he didn't have anything to hide.
All MOO.

I agree. That's another reason why I think the brother knocked on the wrong door. There was something to hide in another room. It's not hard to believe that Maya's family wouldn't know their sleeping arrangements. If any of my family decided to sleep in separate rooms, I wouldn't know either. It's common sense to knock on the Master Bedroom door if you aren't given any reason to suspect she hasn't been sleeping in a different room. Or, the locked door could just be a way to extend the amount of time before the missing person report is filed. He did say he knows that the first 48 to 72 hours are the most critical. Either way, it's a red flag for me. Big MOO on this one
 
I think you might have the wrong information. The door was locked both times her family went to check on her. But it wasn't until Saturday morning when Maya's father went to see her that Larry found the keys and unlocked the door. But I agree about the door being locked. It is odd. There's a lot of speculation on it but few answers IMO
Ohh you’re right. I’m watching a family interview.
Thanks for clarifying
 
What if something happened to Maya the night before, later explained away as kitchen sounds, rustling, making herself a meal, when in reality there was a scuffle? That was heard by everyone upstairs.

We have no indication by ANYONE that she was accounted for on Friday....

Since no one is named a POI, let's pretend for the sake of argument, that the husband and children were upstairs, all equally hearing rustling sounds below, and an intruder accosted Maya, left with her body, backtracking only to slip upstairs and lock her bedroom door...

So everybody thought Maya was in her bedroom. All night, all the next day.....

Sounds like a presplain to me.

What you heard downstairs, that was just mommy making sandwiches, all by herself.

If there's a suspect fridge door, possibly another presplain. Cops did it.

What we know might be vastly than what young children are led to believe.

Maya might've left on foot after dark, that's why she's not seen on any security cams. More presplain.

If I thought my spouse walked away after dark, that's where I'd start searching....

IMO we aren't getting facts, we're getting explanations. Much like in the missing Suzanne case.

Deja vu.

JMO

Sorry to reply to the same comment but it does segway nicely into something I've been wondering about.

In the interview, Larry says that his inlaws are over and start talking to the neighbors to see if they can see her on camera. He says "they were trying to figure out *if- w-w-when* she left." He literally says if. I don't know if I'm looking too hard into this but this was HUGE for me. It makes me feel like he knows she didn't leave on her own. He then follows this up by basically saying they think they saw "it" on the cameras but it was "night time." Now, all that being said, it's very possible he just misspoke. Very very possible. But I have a feeling that professionals like Peter Hyatt and Steve Johnson would also think that statement is super alarming. He also says "it" when he should say "her" and even the word "night time" makes me feel like the incident happened in the evening and not in the early morning like he originally stated. He could have just said "dark" and that wouldn't have alerted me in any way. MOO but I feel pretty strongly about the words if and it. Not so much about night-time but I figured I'd mention it anyway. JMO and BBM
 
I also have a question about the overall statement Larry seems to be making. He seems to jump back and forth between what he thinks happened to his wife. At first, he keeps talking about how she always leaves and goes hiking and drinking and always wants space. He makes her sound like an irresponsible parent and prone to temper tantrums that make her leave for a "day(s)". At one point in the interview, he even blames her and calls this situation embarrassing. But then he'll say that something terrible must have happened. That he is really worried and he even uses the word kidnap at one point. He jumps back and forth between the two possibilities throughout the interview. But he seems like he's very quick to dismiss the possibility that she was in a hiking accident. To me, that's the most probable thing to have happened if a crime wasn't committed. She's an avid hiker, she has hiking almost directly behind her house, and she was training for an upcoming hike. She left with nothing but a phone and the bare essentials. Hiking is dangerous no matter what terrain you're in and an accident just doesn't seem that unbelievable. He just dismisses the possibility seemingly right away because he said her phone would be with her. I'm sure other people that had an unfortunate hiking accident felt the same way and yet they were still in a situation where they couldn't call for help. So why is he so quick to dismiss it. It would be my first assumption if it were me. Why?
 
I agree. That's another reason why I think the brother knocked on the wrong door. There was something to hide in another room. It's not hard to believe that Maya's family wouldn't know their sleeping arrangements. If any of my family decided to sleep in separate rooms, I wouldn't know either. It's common sense to knock on the Master Bedroom door if you aren't given any reason to suspect she hasn't been sleeping in a different room. Or, the locked door could just be a way to extend the amount of time before the missing person report is filed. He did say he knows that the first 48 to 72 hours are the most critical. Either way, it's a red flag for me. Big MOO on this one

Why do you think it was the wrong door? Maricris confirmed it was the master bedroom upstairs that was locked and she was in supposedly and that was the door brother was knocking on. The 9 year old confirmed Maya hasn't left that room for 11hours.
Do I misunderstand what you are saying?
 
Why do you think it was the wrong door? Maricris confirmed it was the master bedroom upstairs that was locked and she was in supposedly and that was the door brother was knocking on. The 9 year old confirmed Maya hasn't left that room for 11hours.
Do I misunderstand what you are saying?

My assumption is solely based on the statement made by Larry that says he can hear her rustling around (apparently in the kitchen) and in the other bedroom sleeping with the kids (where he again says "in the other bedroom"). He than says "upstairs (doesn't say who is upstairs) but follows it with "she's downstairs" and "like a roommate."

This is all just an assumption on my part and I hope that nobody looks too far into it as it could very easily be completely inaccurate. It's just a theory on my part.

But again, if I'm supposed to believe Larry's statement, why would Maya be in the master bedroom (upstairs according to Maricris) if she wanted space from him? I'm operating under the assumption that Larry meant she was sleeping in the other room downstairs but that could very easily be false. He could easily have made a mistake and so could I. It just doesn't line up in my brain

Edit: Again, I'm speculating heavily on this part but Larry could have told the girls that their Mom was in the master bedroom upstairs and not to disturb her. That door remained locked for 11 hours which I believe is true. That doesn't mean that's where she was sleeping regularly or had even been in that room at all that day. She could have set up permanent residence in the kitchen for all I know. But according to Larry's statement, she was probably not sharing a bed with him. She was probably sleeping somewhere downstairs regularly. And since they have 5 bedrooms, she was probably in a room downstairs. But I have made a lot of assumptions in regards to this so I really don't want to mislead anyone. This, I fear, is how rumors are started
 
Last edited:
This whole thing might just be about the kids. Not about the money, the cars, the house, cheating, etc... but about the children.

The father seems possessive regarding the children. They are clearly being isolated too. If someone was asking for a divorce and planning on getting custody, the other party may have been upset.
 
This whole thing might just be about the kids. Not about the money, the cars, the house, cheating, etc... but about the children.

The father seems possessive regarding the children. They are clearly being isolated too. If someone was asking for a divorce and planning on getting custody, the other party may have been upset.

I agree. I also feel as if he may have been a bit possessive about Maya as well. He certainly seemed to be monitoring her while they seemingly lived separate lives. It's a big speculation because I'm sure they'd have to know a few things about each other's lives in order to make sure the children were being taken care of. The concern that Larry may have been a bit controlling was brought up by the professionals in The Interview Room video. But otherwise it's MOO
 
Why do you think it was the wrong door? Maricris confirmed it was the master bedroom upstairs that was locked and she was in supposedly and that was the door brother was knocking on. The 9 year old confirmed Maya hasn't left that room for 11hours.
Do I misunderstand what you are saying?

Sorry to reply to the same statement again, but I wanted to add to my clarification and I'm not sure if editing twice is a good idea.

Larry never actually says where Maya sleeps. That was all assumption made by me. But he does say she wanted "space" at least 5 times in the interview. That to me just says she probably wouldn't be sleeping in the same room as him. I am assuming that he is the one that resides in the master bedroom only because he said that she's downstairs and having both parents vacate the master bedroom makes zero sense to me. But it's also very possible that she slept in one of the kids rooms or elsewhere in the house, or even in the master bedroom. I could very easily could have read his statement wrong and I feel like that's most likely at this point. Is the bedroom downstairs used as a bedroom or guest room? Maybe it's a playroom. If I knew more about that bedroom, maybe we could put my assumptions to rest.

I must say that I regret saying that though. It might not be helpful information even though I felt like it was at the time. I really really don't want to cause any sort of confusion that may lead us further away from the truth
 
This whole thing might just be about the kids. Not about the money, the cars, the house, cheating, etc... but about the children.

The father seems possessive regarding the children. They are clearly being isolated too. If someone was asking for a divorce and planning on getting custody, the other party may have been upset.

This is a great point, IMO, that I (and maybe other sleuthers too) had not fully considered. To this point, I wonder if LM and MM were generally well-aligned in terms of their approaches to parenting/expectations of their children, or if one might have felt the other was "too harsh"/"too strict" or conversely "too lenient"/"too indulgent." The splitting up of the son from the daughters (in the context of LM's early-morning trip with the couple's young son--and WITHOUT the couple's daughters--to the beach on that cold Friday morning MM was first noted to be missing) makes it seem like there might have been differing values attached to the only son versus the couple's other children (although it could simply be that the son was brought along with LM because he was the only child not old enough to have to virtually "attend" school that Friday). IMO/MOO of course!
 
Sorry to reply to the same statement again, but I wanted to add to my clarification and I'm not sure if editing twice is a good idea.

Larry never actually says where Maya sleeps. That was all assumption made by me. But he does say she wanted "space" at least 5 times in the interview. That to me just says she probably wouldn't be sleeping in the same room as him. I am assuming that he is the one that resides in the master bedroom only because he said that she's downstairs and having both parents vacate the master bedroom makes zero sense to me. But it's also very possible that she slept in one of the kids rooms or elsewhere in the house, or even in the master bedroom. I could very easily could have read his statement wrong and I feel like that's most likely at this point. Is the bedroom downstairs used as a bedroom or guest room? Maybe it's a playroom. If I knew more about that bedroom, maybe we could put my assumptions to rest.

I must say that I regret saying that though. It might not be helpful information even though I felt like it was at the time. I really really don't want to cause any sort of confusion that may lead us further away from the truth

Thanks for the reply!

I understand, and it makes sense tbh regarding the noise downstairs but wasn't he saying that the boy was sleeping with her? I guess she could sleep in the boy's room as well normally, my 4 year old is just getting used to sleeping in her own bed for all night so it would be absolutely realistic.
But then why the master locked? Perhaps downstairs bedroom hasn't got a lock. Big question where did LM sleep on Thursday night (if he slept at all that night)
All MOO
 
This is a great point, IMO, that I (and maybe other sleuthers too) had not fully considered. To this point, I wonder if LM and MM were generally well-aligned in terms of their approaches to parenting/expectations of their children, or if one might have felt the other was "too harsh"/"too strict" or conversely "too lenient"/"too indulgent." The splitting up of the son from the daughters (in the context of LM's early-morning trip with the couple's young son--and WITHOUT the couple's daughters--to the beach on that cold Friday morning MM was first noted to be missing) makes it seem like there might have been differing values attached to the only son versus the couple's other children (although it could simply be that the son was brought along with LM because he was the only child not old enough to have to virtually "attend" school that Friday). IMO/MOO of course!


Is the Philippine culture boy biased? Meaning he was his heir and namesake etc.
She did post that Facebook pic about the son being her only love.. MOO
 
Thanks for the reply!

I understand, and it makes sense tbh regarding the noise downstairs but wasn't he saying that the boy was sleeping with her? I guess she could sleep in the boy's room as well normally, my 4 year old is just getting used to sleeping in her own bed for all night so it would be absolutely realistic.
But then why the master locked? Perhaps downstairs bedroom hasn't got a lock. Big question where did LM sleep on Thursday night (if he slept at all that night)
All MOO

Whichever room it was that was locked, I believe it was so LM could explain to the kids why she wasn't seen all day Friday.

Something like "Mom is working and needs to not be bothered, girls, so leave her alone and you'll see her later." The 4 year old went with him on Friday because he would have been more difficult to control in that situation, as 4 year olds don't care too much about any "rules" given by Mom/Dad.
 
Thanks for the reply!

I understand, and it makes sense tbh regarding the noise downstairs but wasn't he saying that the boy was sleeping with her? I guess she could sleep in the boy's room as well normally, my 4 year old is just getting used to sleeping in her own bed for all night so it would be absolutely realistic.
But then why the master locked? Perhaps downstairs bedroom hasn't got a lock. Big question where did LM sleep on Thursday night (if he slept at all that night)
All MOO

It's very possible. However, Larry did say that he could hear her "sleeping with the kids in the other bedroom" and kids was definitely plural. So at least two of the kids if he didn't make a mistake. Maricris said the 4 year old's room was currently being used as storage but it's possible that someone was sleeping in there.

My basic understanding of how most homes are laid out is that the master bedroom is located close to the other smaller bedrooms. The last bedroom is usually located further away and more commonly used as a guest room, office, playroom, etc. Most homes may not pertain to this one however so that's just an opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
166
Guests online
288
Total visitors
454

Forum statistics

Threads
609,232
Messages
18,251,231
Members
234,582
Latest member
khancken
Back
Top