Patty G
Retired WS Staff
IMO, sadly Michele Le seems to be forgotten in the MSM articles and what happened to her and who did it.
Exactly. Wait until the family and the other volunteers that were in the same area that day and Brad Dennis (Search Director) give their side of the story about this. Has anybody interviewed them about who found the remains?
Again, it SHOULD not matter who found the remains. BUT, now the media makes it seem like it does.
In that video interview, Carrie even mentions there was a search group ahead of them. Needs to be verified though. (See I don't just take a single person's word and call it fact). Do not get me wrong, I think Team Amber and Carrie are superb people and bless her heart that she was in the area. That's very special in itself. But to make stories and headlines about who found the remains/grave first without being verified by other volunteers in the same area and group nor the family nor the search director, that just irritates me. And people of course believe it because it's on the news and retold by a police spokesman who didn't even know if dogs were in the area previously or not.
IMO, sadly Michele Le seems to be forgotten in the MSM articles and what happened to her and who did it.
One thing I can tell you, Google Earth is NOT constantly updated. I know for a fact based on viewing the changes in landscaping around my own home, they are usually about 6 months out of date. I doubt you could get results for a certain date and have it be accurate as to what vehicles were there. They would have have to have been filming at the exact time, and Michelle was kidnapped at night.Can you get recent video from Google earth, Bing Mapquest,
of the day of the disappearance and show whose vehicle drove back there.
What type of weapon caused the death, blunt force trauma or sharp entry wound.
Could a rock be at the scene if a Knife was it thrown toward the water.
the scene is strange its a cliff on one side you wouldnt drive there at night.
Was she tied up
Was there lots of blood at the scene. Well it stay in the earth.
How long can blood last on a object when it is exposed to the elements.
Did they get any tire tracks prints.
it had been a long time but if hers was the only vehicle could there be prints.
Is there evidence of the area on Michelle's car.(Dirt, weeds etc)
is there evidence of the area at GEs house or car.
Did they take any of the logs for prints.
Possible dna on logs
Was she tied up
was she wrapped up in anything
How did she find this area (GE)
is it on her computer google maps etc
Does her cell phone show her in the area often.
Where does she work
does her work involve this area
Could she have entered from the golf club side
Does she have any recent scars that could have left trace elements in Michelles car
Under a door latch, under a seat etc
How was the body positioned, was it sending a message
revenge, embarrassment, or just quick leave her and hide her
Has she ever returned to the scene after the fact
once again, onstar,fastrak cell towers etc they all track vehicles.
How does this development take away in the least from the investigation or the impending court case???:waitasec: It's slow news until Giselle appears back in court which was postponed until the 28th I believe...So now the COMPLETE focus is on WHO found Michelle Le's remains.
The family or Michelle is barely mentioned.
While I am not saying that "Amber's" mom doesn't deserve credit - it takes away from everyone's contributions, the investigation, and impending court case.
Now the media is saturated with who found her.
I'm disgusted. It's almost as if they are going to star her and the dog in a new Lifetime drama movie.
Yeah, but we did convict Scott Peterson, he's on Death Row, and Hans Reiser was convicted without the body!Convicted by Jury of Her Peers. (remember the C Anthony case OJ?)
HPD will need to make sure this is a OPEN AND SHUT case.
Since this is a criminal case they need 12 to convict.
If not it could be a hung jury.
Or worse a Walk.
Now this is going on the presumption there is enough evidence to prove she is
Guilty.
She is presumed innocent until convicted.
But the district attorney wouldnt have given the green light without evidence.
California is a very strange and unique part of the United States.
Strange things happen and people get to walk.
And since she is a woman there could be a sympathy factor by the jury.
i.e. she is a young woman with children bla bla.
If she did it she deserves to spend a long time in prison!
Convicted by Jury of Her Peers. (remember the C Anthony case OJ?)
HPD will need to make sure this is a OPEN AND SHUT case.
Since this is a criminal case they need 12 to convict.
If not it could be a hung jury.
Or worse a Walk.
Now this is going on the presumption there is enough evidence to prove she is
Guilty.
She is presumed innocent until convicted.
But the district attorney wouldnt have given the green light without evidence.
California is a very strange and unique part of the United States.
Strange things happen and people get to walk.
And since she is a woman there could be a sympathy factor by the jury.
i.e. she is a young woman with children bla bla.
If she did it she deserves to spend a long time in prison!
I think LE will have a good case to put together. They have DNA, they have cell activity and they seem to have some sort of video; they named her as a POI from the start (which is unusual these days) so they must have had some reason to do so and probably wanted the DNA to back it up, plus of course to find Michelle. They may have even more evidence from Michelle herself.
A couple of things from the People Magazine article I'd not read before:
"[Michelle's cousin, Krystine] Dinh insists there was no love triangle that Le and Marasigan were only friends and that Le wasn't the type to make enemies."
"Esteban also says she's pregnant again with another of Marasigan's babies. Authorities say they don't know if thats true, but they confirm that Esteban is seven months pregnant."
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20529799,00.html
bolded by me.
Yesterday evening was the memorial for Michelle. I wasn't able to attend but this morning on t.v. they showed her brother speaking at the memorial and it broke my heart.
I am angry at, and frustrated with, KTVU (and probably other channels) for continuing to say that she was killed "because of a love triangle" when the family keeps saying it was not a love triangle.
Columbo - I agree. However, I think that Esteban "thought" that there was a triangle. Esteban said that she hated Michelle because of her relationship with Marasigan. Possibly they should word it as Esteban's vision of a triangle? Uuggghhhh :banghead: What a horrible excuse for violence!