alucardsdream
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2016
- Messages
- 1,143
- Reaction score
- 5,576
Found something for real! She's listed in this document as an employee hired by La Bahia Restaurant in Stockton, CA. Here's the relevant section (BBM):
"1. As previously found and discussed, I have determined that Respondent Armando Palacio, d/b/a La Bahia Restaurant, violated Section 1324a(a)(1)(B) of Title 8, 274A(a)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, in that it hired for employment in the United States after November 6, 1986, the following individuals without complying with the verification requirements in 8 U.S.C. Section 1324a(b)(1), Section 274A(b)(1) of the Act, and 8 C.F.R. Section 274A.2(b)(1)(ii):
Gaudalupe Avila
Maria R. Castaneda
Fortino N. Cortez
Maria de Consuelo Esparza
Liopoldo Angeles H. Gabriel
Francisco Gomez
Sandra B. Gomez
Maria R. A. Mandujano
Frosty O'Malley
Petra Pecheco
Rosa Velasquez Quiroz
Carmen Ramirez
Silvia Rivera
Margarita Sanchez
Brenda Vinson"
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/1998/09/02/230.pdf
So there's your O'Malley name and a possibility she was an immigrant (from Ireland, I'd assume?)
I saw that yesterday and saved it, but I haven't been able to get any further since it doesn't give any other information about her. It does suggest that she was using Frosty as her legal name at this point. If O'Malley was her birth name, then she may not have been married before getting together with Donald Austin in 1991 or so. And while this filing suggests that she may not have been legally able to work in the US, it could mean that she was legal but the restaurant just failed to complete I-9 paperwork for her, which needs to be done for everyone, including US-born citizens. I poked around Lexis looking for more info on the case (I am actually a lawyer so use it pretty regularly) but haven't come up with anything else useful. This case is consuming my thoughts, though!