GUILTY CA - Paul Pelosi, the speaker’s husband, violently attacked after assailant broke into their SF home, Oct 2022 *arrest*

New Posts

Next court date for him is Dec. 28th on the arraignment on the State charges according to a reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle that I just heard on MSNBC. February on the Federal charges.
 

Pelosi’s California home didn’t receive security review in four years before October’s violent attack, Capitol Police chief says​



www.cnn.com

Pelosi's California home didn't receive security review in four years before October's violent attack, Capitol Police chief says | CNN Politics

Before the violent attack on her husband in late October, the security of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's California home had not been assessed by United States Capitol Police since 2018, Police Chief Thomas Manger told CNN's Pamela Brown in an exclusive interview Tuesday.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
 
IzzyBlanche said:
I wonder where DePape was radicalized.
Click to expand...

IIRC, in some earlier articles they interviewed his friends and people he rented from. They said he started spending a LOT of time on his computer, visiting conspiracy theory web sites and discussion groups. He stopped going out and even didn't want to go work at his job. Spent all his time on the computer.
 
Missing Susan said:
If you don't think the detail about "who opened the door" is at all important, why would nbc suspend an award winning journalist for (possibly accurately) reporting about "who opened the door"? Why not let him correct the record? No harm, no foul.
Click to expand...
Because it was spun to support the conspiracy theories that Paul wasn't in danger. It was completely inaccurate reporting. Reporters don't get to go "on the record" and correct their stories. That's something that only newspapers do. The bodycam footage has been released and shows Pelosi opening the door. He was in danger whether he realized it or not. There's no conspiracy that he was in on it with DePape, who was a total stranger, who woke him up in the middle of the night after breaking in. That's why Pelosi was in his underwear- and he was the only one who was.
 
BayouBelle_LA said:
I see discussion of the minutiae of cases on nearly every thread I follow. Even though the big picture is known I think it’s the nature of the sleuther to want to know everything about anything, even though it doesn’t change the big picture.

When a journalist is suspended over a report that appears to be factual reporting, I want to know why. I am more curious now that another NBC affiliate is reporting the same things.

imo
Click to expand...
It was proven NOT to be factual.
 
Ontario Mom said:
I honestly couldn't care less about the garbage folks say on social media. Frankly, if social media imploded today and never came back, I think the world would be a much better place.

That said, it's critically important to document, factually, detail by detail, everything that happened and establish the timeline of the events. In any case, this one or any other. This creep that broke in and assaulted PP is probably enjoying all this stupid controversy and I'm sure his eventual lawyer(s) are too, and will use it in his defense. And that's why, IMO it's vitally important ALL of it is documented. Including who opened the door, who was standing where, any conversation that happened, etc., before PP was attacked.

jmo
Click to expand...
They can try and use it in his defense, but we aren't to that stage of the case yet, so it's not relevant, and I don't care to provide his defense team with possible strategies.
 
LinasK said:
They can try and use it in his defense, but we aren't to that stage of the case yet, so it's not relevant, and I don't care to provide his defense team with possible strategies.
Click to expand...
Facts are always relevant, at every stage of a case.
That's all anyone wants in this case as well. Well, that and due justice, that comes as a result of showing those facts.
 
Ontario Mom said:
Facts are always relevant, at every stage of a case.
That's all anyone wants in this case as well. Well, that and due justice, that comes as a result of showing those facts.
Click to expand...
Actual facts, yes. Not hypotheses as to why the victim opened the door. The victim isn't on trial here. I've seen no other case where it was questioned why a victim opened the door for the police.
 
Last edited:
LinasK said:
Actual facts, yes. Not hypotheses as to why the victim opened the door. The victim isn't on trial here. I've seen no other case where it was questioned why a victim opened the door for the police.
Click to expand...
I've followed countless cases on here where everyone questions just about everything in a case, including why the victim did/said what they did. It all helps to understand why folks do what they do, and that's never a bad thing, to encourage questions for that reason.

In this specific case, I think the sudden action of pulling the story and canning the journalist did more harm than good, as it just seemed to feed that sort of "red flag conspiracy" thing so common now. I think that was a very bad move.

Either way, in the end I think justice will be done and I'm glad for that.

jmo
 
Ontario Mom said:
I've followed countless cases on here where everyone questions just about everything in a case, including why the victim did/said what they did. It all helps to understand why folks do what they do, and that's never a bad thing, to encourage questions for that reason.

In this specific case, I think the sudden action of pulling the story and canning the journalist did more harm than good, as it just seemed to feed that sort of "red flag conspiracy" thing so common now. I think that was a very bad move.

Either way, in the end I think justice will be done and I'm glad for that.

jmo
Click to expand...

Questioning the situation is fine, but it seemed to me that it wasn't questioning that's the issue here, but the implication made in the questioning. When LE points to a victim, for people to suggest the victim wasn't really a victim because he opened the door is wrong and that doesn't happen on other threads. jmo
 
BeginnerSleuther said:
Questioning the situation is fine, but it seemed to me that it wasn't questioning that's the issue here, but the implication made in the questioning. When LE points to a victim, for people to suggest the victim wasn't really a victim because he opened the door is wrong and that doesn't happen on other threads. jmo
Click to expand...
People read into things that aren't there. It happens. In any case, I'm glad this nut was caught and will face due justice for what he did.
 
Ontario Mom said:
I've followed countless cases on here where everyone questions just about everything in a case, including why the victim did/said what they did. It all helps to understand why folks do what they do, and that's never a bad thing, to encourage questions for that reason.

In this specific case, I think the sudden action of pulling the story and canning the journalist did more harm than good, as it just seemed to feed that sort of "red flag conspiracy" thing so common now. I think that was a very bad move.

Either way, in the end I think justice will be done and I'm glad for that.

jmo
Click to expand...
Faulty journalism should always be called out. It was irresponsible of the reporter not to fact-check his sources. So many false rumors were spread because of it. I'm glad that he lost his job. It's journalism 101 to fact-check your sources, and I'm not even a reporter.
 
Ontario Mom said:
People read into things that aren't there. It happens. In any case, I'm glad this nut was caught and will face due justice for what he did.
Click to expand...

Not sure if you're implying we're reading into things or that the people implying unsavory things were. Either way, I think we can all agree now that those conspiracy theories were wrong and this victim deserves the same consideration every other victim does. JMO.
 

Biggest criminal murder trials set to begin in 2023​


Unknown — David DePape (California)

David DePape, 42, will stand trial sometime in 2023. After his preliminary hearing on Dec. 14, a trial is expected to begin in the new year.

DePape was charged with both federal and state charges after he attacked Paul Pelosi, husband of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), in their San Francisco home on Oct. 28 with a hammer. DePape was seeking out Nancy Pelosi, threatening to break her kneecaps if he didn't receive the answers he sought.

Biggest criminal murder trials set to begin in 2023


Please note: This is not a murder trial; however, charges include attempted murder charge. MOO
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Staff online

Members online

... and 56 more.
Total: 830 (members: 57, guests: 773)

Online statistics

Members online
57
Guests online
773
Total visitors
830
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
615,903
Messages
18,342,539
Members
236,858
Latest member
Smith1
Back
Top