From the article link in Post #2:
On Thursday, the same prosecutors acknowledged those results were wrong, and convinced a judge to dismiss their case against Sommer, who had been preparing for a retrial next month. The lawyers could not, however, explain to the public why new tests of previously untouched samples of Marine Sgt. Todd Sommer's tissue showed no trace of arsenic.
Apparently they still had untouched samples of tissue. That same article has her attorney accusing the prosecution of gross negligence. Since it the prosecutor dismissing the charges, I don't see how they can deny that there was no negligence on their part.
Since they were getting ready for a retrial does this mean she can be tried at a later date, or is this judgement final?
On Thursday, the same prosecutors acknowledged those results were wrong, and convinced a judge to dismiss their case against Sommer, who had been preparing for a retrial next month. The lawyers could not, however, explain to the public why new tests of previously untouched samples of Marine Sgt. Todd Sommer's tissue showed no trace of arsenic.
Apparently they still had untouched samples of tissue. That same article has her attorney accusing the prosecution of gross negligence. Since it the prosecutor dismissing the charges, I don't see how they can deny that there was no negligence on their part.
Since they were getting ready for a retrial does this mean she can be tried at a later date, or is this judgement final?