IllinoisMissing
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 812
- Reaction score
- 77
I wonder if thats a good news source?
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
I don't know what to take as true and I wonder if some of what has been put out is intentional misdirection. What hangs me up is that she is reported by neighbors to have been seen from around 11 AM to 2 PM, which is a very long time. If she really was seen outside on the street during that timeframe with that being accurate information, that to me would point to her staging things. I just don't know what to make of the timeline as I consider it suspect and I also don't rule out that a neighbor witness actually gave intentional misinformation because they're the perp.
I just saw something interesting in this photo. It looks like community mailboxes on the side of the road. I know she didn't live on this particular street from previous posts but I'm wondering if her direct neighborhood might have this same set up for mail delivery since it seems to homes are spaced so far apart? If so, maybe she went to check on the mail and was abducted? This could possibly be a reason for not completing the wrapping job on the gift. She hears the mail truck, stops what she's doing and goes to check the mail and vanishes? Just thinking out loud...I'm still thinking she made it home after jogging and was interrupted by either hearing someone on her property or at the door. She may have thought it was Keith and been surprised.
I think her phone at that intersection was thrown there. If you were going to kidnap her there were far more secluded places along her route. Not sure i can get it to post but there is clearly a house within view of that intersection. Why risk being seen? However that would be the logical route to drive out away from her home.
JMO
![]()
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
That's what I keep thinking...until I remember the Bearden case. Leanne was RIGHT THERE all along. If the property owner had walked his property, she would have been found much sooner.
I've just made it through this entire thread in one sitting and I'm so confused! Of course, I'll keep a look out, but is this really an abduction?
Why does a half-wrapped present already have a name tag on it?
What does the Lt. mean by the word "physical" in the following statement: Sheriffs Office detectives have confirmed his whereabouts on the day in question, and there is no physical evidence at this time suggesting he had any involvement.? I mean, he could have said "no evidence" and left out the specific type (physical) and left out the "at this time" but he didn't. Why? I understand the husband is not to be considered suspect, so just take that as one of the observations that leave me questioning an abduction.
Why are all the pics of her that have been given to LE so perfect? It's like someone selected the absolute best looking pics because they knew they would be seen on local and maybe national tv, when I am almost certain LE has asked for different types of pics. Where are they? And I don't mean that half-nude photobucket pic she took of herself. FWIW, source code shows she copied that pic to the website in 2007.
I don't mean to offend anyone, but I'm having a hard time taking this case at face value.
That's what I keep thinking...until I remember the Bearden case. Leanne was RIGHT THERE all along. If the property owner had walked his property, she would have been found much sooner.
I don't know what to take as true and I wonder if some of what has been put out is intentional misdirection. What hangs me up is that she is reported by neighbors to have been seen from around 11 AM to 2 PM, which is a very long time. If she really was seen outside on the street during that timeframe with that being accurate information, that to me would point to her staging things. I just don't know what to make of the timeline as I consider it suspect and I also don't rule out that a neighbor witness actually gave intentional misinformation because they're the perp.
In the video it mentions "her pink jogging jacket was spotted nearby".
Is this true??
Was that property searched with dogs and search teams?
Hmmm...I saw the boxes but didn't think too much about them. Maybe that was a distraction for her? I can't get a street view of her house but i don't see any mailboxes in front. Maybe she went for the mail?I just saw something interesting in this photo. It looks like community mailboxes on the side of the road. I know she didn't live on this particular street from previous posts but I'm wondering if her direct neighborhood might have this same set up for mail delivery since it seems to homes are spaced so far apart? If so, maybe she went to check on the mail and was abducted? This could possibly be a reason for not completing the wrapping job on the gift. She hears the mail truck, stops what she's doing and goes to check the mail and vanishes? Just thinking out loud...
Sent from my VK410 using Tapatalk
Just an FYI: California, Washington and Oregon are #4, 5 & 6 on the Top Ten List of States With the Most Serial Murders. That's one scary corridor.
She was wearing earbuds. You cannot be very alert and aware of your surroundings while wearing earbuds or otherwise being distracted.
Shasta County sheriff's officials don't know why the California Department of Justice identifies local missing woman Sherri Papini as someone who left her family, and they've asked the agency to change the "voluntary missing adult" classification assigned to her.
I believe it. That same corridor has also been known to be a horrible area for drug transports and sex trafficking because I-5 runs all the way through all 3 states.