"In a statement from Sherri's husband, Keith Papini, he said, "I AM aware that there is a ransom reward being offered to the individual who has my wife." Keith added, "I am NOT aware of who the individual is that is paying the reward. They want to remain anonymous."
Interesting that KP used the phrase "reward being offered to the individual who has my wife" (singular) not "individual or individuals" or "persons" (plural). The first implies IMO the individual is known or suspected,versus the second implies a more general "whoever they are".
Some more observations on this weird case -
- the picking up of the children at daycare. The staff at the center know who they released them to. Whoever it was they would have to have been pre-approved to pick them up, and likely not the first time. If KP had to leave work to pick them up that would raise a flag right then something was amiss. But if family did regularly then it was maybe just another regular task to cover for whatever SP was usually doing otherwise. There must have been communications coordinating this.
- the package half-wrapped, was it being wrapped, or un-wrapped, as if someone brought it that day? It was stated that is was not seen there in the morning.
Just too many vague elements. IMO there must be some dispute behind this that is being kept quite.
-