missgulfsouth
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 3,004
- Reaction score
- 60
But do you know she didn't as well?
Nope. If she left voluntarily I expect she was prepared.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But do you know she didn't as well?
Perhaps they're trying to flatter her into coming back with images of happier times.
(Stagehand somewhat wearily hauls this out again.)
So what happened, ya think? List your top 3 or 5 or dozen, in order. No. 2 pencil.
Possibilities
.1. Abducted by person known to her; still alive
.2. Abducted by person known to her; now deceased
.3. Abducted by unknown party; still alive
.4. Abducted by unknown party; now deceased
.5. Murdered by known person; jog a red herring
.6. Hit by car; driver fled scene with body
.7. Suicide; body undiscovered
.8. Amnesia
.9. Hoax
10. Wilfully missing
11. Witness protection
12. Human traffickers
13. Space aliens
14. Crazy clowns
.
.
It's still bothering me why they are not using more recent photos of Sherri on the posters. I've seen comments saying she doesn't look 34, well that's cos in those photos she wasn't. Without the make up and more recently, she does look 34. You just have to look at her families SM, I don't know why none of these other photos aren't being used. Also the pic of her running outfit, it says this is the outfit she was wearing, if that is her why is her head cut off? Surely seeing her as she is now in the actual outfit she was wearing would be the most helpful.
What's the reasoning for this? Is it a strategy? Use the more stunning, attractive photos to get more interest? I think I already know this just, gah!
(Stagehand somewhat wearily hauls this out again.)
So what happened, ya think? List your top 3 or 5 or dozen, in order. No. 2 pencil.
Possibilities
.1. Abducted by person known to her; still alive
.2. Abducted by person known to her; now deceased
.3. Abducted by unknown party; still alive
.4. Abducted by unknown party; now deceased
.5. Murdered by known person; jog a red herring
.6. Hit by car; driver fled scene with body
.7. Suicide; body undiscovered
.8. Amnesia
.9. Hoax
10. Wilfully missing
11. Witness protection
12. Human traffickers
13. Space aliens
14. Crazy clowns
.
.
There was a woman that walked out of a Christian Woman's conference and disappeared. They eventually found out that she pawned her wedding rings for money. Upon further investigation, she was having problems at work. This wasn't revealed immediately though.The thing that makes me convinced she didn't leave voluntarily is that it's so so very rare for a woman (men seem to do this with more regularity) to leave with nothing and no evidence of having left. There may BE evidence that we just don't know about.
Women who purposely disappear usually at least have their purse, and sometimes have their car. The car may be found abandoned later, but they still have their purse. And may have made a bank withdrawal recently. And may have vaguely hinted that they were leaving, or may be facing a crisis like a petty crime charge, flunking out of college, etc.
Can anyone think of a time when a woman was found to have purposely left, and the circumstances were similar to this? No vehicle, no purse, no apparent funds, no apparent motive, etc?
The thing that makes me convinced she didn't leave voluntarily is that it's so so very rare for a woman (men seem to do this with more regularity) to leave with nothing and no evidence of having left. There may BE evidence that we just don't know about.
Women who purposely disappear usually at least have their purse, and sometimes have their car. The car may be found abandoned later, but they still have their purse. And may have made a bank withdrawal recently. And may have vaguely hinted that they were leaving, or may be facing a crisis like a petty crime charge, flunking out of college, etc.
Can anyone think of a time when a woman was found to have purposely left, and the circumstances were similar to this? No vehicle, no purse, no apparent funds, no apparent motive, etc?
It's still bothering me why they are not using more recent photos of Sherri on the posters. I've seen comments saying she doesn't look 34, well that's cos in those photos she wasn't. Without the make up and more recently, she does look 34. You just have to look at her families SM, I don't know why none of these other photos aren't being used. Also the pic of her running outfit, it says this is the outfit she was wearing, if that is her why is her head cut off? Surely seeing her as she is now in the actual outfit she was wearing would be the most helpful.
What's the reasoning for this? Is it a strategy? Use the more stunning, attractive photos to get more interest? I think I already know this just, gah!
This DOJ poster states black Under Armour running shoesI want to clarify something because it's really bothering me that this keeps getting thrown around as fact. Keith *DID* try to contact SP before he used the Find My iPhone app. This was reported in MSM articles. Here's one example:
http://people.com/crime/missing-sherri-papini-update-husband-keith-interview/
Keith says he texted his wife again, and when she didnt respond he used the Find my iPhone application and located his her cell phone and earbuds about one mile from their home, near the intersection of Old Oregon Trail and Sunrise Drive. The earbuds reportedly had strands of Sherris hair on them.
Also, they are aware of what shoes she was wearing:
http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/family-fears-woman-last-seen-on-afternoon-jog-was-abducted/
She had been wearing pink shoes and was planning on meeting up with her husband, Keith Papini, later in the evening after her jog. But when he returned home, Papini was nowhere to be found.
I assumed it was because she wanted to post a lot of pictures and stories about her kids but wanted to protect them too. I know a lot of mothers who do this, and many of them have nicknames for their children when they talk about them online.
There are people out there who will lift pictures of other children and show them off as if they are their own, or use them in other ways so I get why some people want to keep them as private as possible.
It's still bothering me why they are not using more recent photos of Sherri on the posters. I've seen comments saying she doesn't look 34, well that's cos in those photos she wasn't. Without the make up and more recently, she does look 34. You just have to look at her families SM, I don't know why none of these other photos aren't being used. Also the pic of her running outfit, it says this is the outfit she was wearing, if that is her why is her head cut off? Surely seeing her as she is now in the actual outfit she was wearing would be the most helpful.
What's the reasoning for this? Is it a strategy? Use the more stunning, attractive photos to get more interest? I think I already know this just, gah!
Interesting observations about the photos. I think it's actually really common for family to release older pictures in cases like this. They choose their favorites where their loved one looks their best. I admit I was sort of bothered that the flyer floating around on social media featured her in her wedding dress because I know that was several years old and nobody looks as good as they did on their wedding day in their daily lives. That said, I went looking for some more recent pics in the media and found a few where we can tell how old they are by the age of the kids. Her kids are currently 2 and 4.
Based on the size of the youngest child I'm guessing these photos are only about a year to year and half old. IMO, Sherri still looks young for her age here but she is wearing makeup. You can see a few more wrinkles but she is every bit as lovely.
As far as the jogging outfit where the head is cut off I assumed they did that because the person wearing the jogging outfit in the photo is NOT Sherri. Sherri bought and sold clothes on a site called Poshmark. Maybe they never had a picture of Sherri in this exact outfit but they have the ad from the person she bought the jogging top from and that is why they used that photo the way they did. The person who posted the ad might have even posted the photo that way to begin with as it is common to do that when selling things on the internet. Just a guess.