GUILTY CA - Sherri Papini, 34, Redding, fake abduction Nov 2016, ARREST MAR 2022 #25

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
They arrested her at the location of her child's piano practice?!
I have to really wonder who in the hello thought that was a good idea. Ugh. o_O
Sounds like they tried to get her away from her kids before they arrested her.

'Alegria admitted the FBI conducted a ruse to get Papini out of the building where her kids where having a piano lesson.

The California mom was told her vehicle was involved in an accident and when she came outside the feds grabbed her. They said she attempted to flee but didn’t get very far and admitted that her kids did see her get arrested. '

I'm sure it would have been less traumatic for the kids if she hadn't made such a scene by attempting to flee, had not yelled 'NO', and had not thrown her cell phone.
 
Sounds like they tried to get her away from her kids before they arrested her.

'Alegria admitted the FBI conducted a ruse to get Papini out of the building where her kids where having a piano lesson.

The California mom was told her vehicle was involved in an accident and when she came outside the feds grabbed her. They said she attempted to flee but didn’t get very far and admitted that her kids did see her get arrested. '

I'm sure it would have been less traumatic for the kids if she hadn't made such a scene by attempting to flee, had not yelled 'NO', and had not thrown her cell phone.
yep it was poor sherri again.
 
Sherri Papini Screamed 'No,' Ran, and Threw Her Phone When FBI Went to Arrest Her: Prosecutor

from link - "In addition, she cannot have contact with witnesses in the case outside of the presence of her attorney. This would include her husband Keith Papini, who gave her his support after her return from the disappearance."

hmmmmmm

From your link:

'In arguing on Tuesday for his client to be released on personal recognizance, defense lawyer Michael Caleb Borges said his client had returned home voluntarily, that there was no evidence she was a danger to anyone else, and that her an ankle monitor would hurt her mental well-being because she had PTSD.'

She suffers from PTSD from a kidnapping that never happened?
 
Well, same article says:
“This defendant ran and successfully hid from law enforcement for three weeks,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Veronica Alegria.

Read more at: https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article259194028.html#storylink=cpy
^^rbbm

From the updated 3/8/22 link:

During a virtual detention hearing Tuesday afternoon, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson agreed with Papini’s attorney that she wasn’t a flight risk or a threat to the community.

She was to be released later that day on the condition her family post a $120,000 bond.

Federal prosecutors, however, argued that Papini needed to be confined, calling her a danger to the community and due to her being an “extreme flight risk” after she orchestrated an “elaborate scheme” that included branding herself to fake her own kidnapping.

“This defendant ran and successfully hid from law enforcement for three weeks,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Veronica Alegria.

[This refers to the 22 days she was missing in November 2016, not 2022].


Alegria also argued that when FBI agents tried to arrest Papini on Thursday, she tried to run from them and threw her cellphone 20 feet.

“She screamed ‘no’ and ran away from them and resisted arrest,” Alegria said.

Papini’s Redding attorney, Michael Borges, countered that the arrest, which took place at her children’s piano practice, took the mother by surprise. He said Papini was merely running toward her children who were behind her.

Prosecutors said the FBI agents tried to lure Papini outside the piano studio and away from her children by saying her car had been in an accident.
 
Federal Laws vs. State Laws
Federal laws, or statutes, are created by the United States Congress to safeguard the citizens of this country. Some criminal acts are federal offenses only and must be prosecuted in U.S. District Court. Other criminal acts are offenses under both federal and state law; so, in those cases, federal and county attorneys must decide if the offender should be tried in U.S. District Court or state court.

Felony or Misdemeanor
Criminal acts fall into two categories: felonies and misdemeanors. Felonies are offenses that may result in prison sentences of more than one year, while misdemeanors carry sentences of one year or less. The United States Congress decides which criminal acts are felonies and which ones are misdemeanors. State legislatures make those determinations for criminal acts that violate state law.

When Someone is Suspected of a Federal Crime...
1. Complaint and Arrest Warrant -- Law enforcement obtains a Warrant for Arrest of the alleged offender. The warrant is based on an Indictment (see below) or a Complaint filed with the U.S. District Court. An Affidavit, signed by a law enforcement officer, usually accompanies the Complaint. The Affidavit explains the crime committed as well as the role of the accused in that crime. In other words, the Affidavit is used to establish probable cause that the accused committed the crime.

2. Initial Appearance -- As soon as practicable after arrest, the alleged offender must be granted an Initial Appearance before a Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge advises the accused of his or her rights and determines if he or she has the financial ability to hire an attorney or if a public defender must be appointed. The Magistrate Judge also sets release conditions, including any bond. At the same time, a federal prosecutor, known as an Assistant United States Attorney, may ask that the defendant be detained.

3. Detention Hearing -- If the alleged offender is detained, a Detention Hearing must be held within three working days. At that hearing, the Magistrate Judge listens to evidence about the accused's risk of flight or danger to the community. The Magistrate Judge then decides if the accused should be detained or released pending trial.

4. Preliminary Hearing -- Within 10 days of arrest on a Complaint, the accused also has the right to a Preliminary Hearing, during which an Assistant U.S. Attorney may offer testimony to establish probable cause, and the defense attorney may provide evidence on behalf of the accused. If the Magistrate Judge overseeing the hearing finds sufficient probable cause as to the commission of the crime as well as the accused's role in it, the accused is bound over for further proceedings by a grand jury. Note, if the grand jury returns an Indictment against an alleged offender before arrest is made, a Preliminary Hearing is not necessary.

5. Grand Jury -- The final decision to prosecute a federal criminal case rests with a grand jury. A federal grand jury is comprised of 23 randomly selected citizens from across the judicial district (This judicial district encompasses the entire State of Minnesota). Those selected to serve on the grand jury do so for a few days each month for approximately one year, after which a new grand jury is selected by the U.S. District Court.

6. Indictment Sought -- Instead of filing a Complaint, or after filing a Complaint, Assistant U.S. Attorneys appear before the grand jury to establish probable cause that a particular person committed a federal felony. They do this by calling witnesses and presenting evidence obtained with Grand Jury Subpoenas. Defense attorneys are not allowed to appear before the grand jury; the accused does not need to testify before the grand jury; and the work of the grand jury is to be kept secret.

7. Indictment Returned -- If the grand jury decides the evidence presented establishes probable cause, it issues an Indictment against the accused. At least 16 of the 23 members of the grand jury must be present to conduct business, and at least 12 jurors must vote to indict. The Indictment is called a True Bill. If the grand jury does not find sufficient probable cause, it returns a No Bill. In a misdemeanor case, or in a felony case where the accused has waived indictment and has agreed, instead, to plead guilty, no case is presented to the grand jury. In those instances, an Information, which is a document outlining probable cause, is filed with the U.S. District Court.

8. Arraignment -- After an Indictment or Information has been filed and arrest has been made, an Arraignment must take place before a Magistrate Judge. During an Arraignment, the accused, now called the defendant, is read the charges against him or her and advised of his or her rights. The defendant also enters a plea of guilty or not guilty. If necessary, a trial date is selected and a schedule set for motion hearings, which may include in-court arguments as to suppression of evidence, etc. Note, the Federal Speedy Trial Act dictates the defendant has right to trial within 70 days from his or her arraignment in U.S. District Court. .

9. Plea Agreement -- Defendants are presumed innocent until they admit guilt or are proven guilty. If a defendant pleads not guilty, a trial takes place unless a Plea Agreement can be reached between the Assistant U.S. Attorney and the defense attorney. In those instances, the defendant must offer a change of plea before a U.S. District Court Judge, who needs to approve the terms of the Plea Agreement.

10. Trial -- A trial is heard before a jury of citizens selected at random from across the judicial district and overseen by a U.S. District Court Judge. At trial, the Assistant U.S. Attorney must -- and the defense attorneys may -- call witnesses and present evidence (The government has the burden of proving the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt). Afterwards, the jury must unanimously decide the verdict. If the defendant is found not guilty, he or she is released. If he or she is convicted, however, the pre-sentencing process begins.

11. Pre-Sentencing -- After the entry of a guilty plea or the unanimous finding of guilt by a jury following trial, the U.S. Probation Office collects information about the defendant and crime victims and supplies it, along with a recommendation for sentence, to the U.S. District Court Judge as part of a Pre-Sentence Investigation Report.

12. Sentencing -- Approximately eight weeks after the entry of a guilty plea or a jury finding of guilt, the U.S. District Court Judge imposes sentence. The sentence may include incarceration in a federal prison; a term of supervised release, formerly called probation; the imposition of a monetary fine; and/or an Order of Restitution directing the defendant to pay the crime victims money lost or expenses incurred due to the offense.

13. Appeal -- The defendant may appeal either the finding of guilt or the sentence or both. To do so, he or she must file with the sentencing court a Notice of Appeal within 10 days from the sentencing, or Judgment, date. Note, if the defendant pled guilty, generally only the sentence may be appealed. Also, sometimes, the defendant gives up, or waives, the right to appeal in the Plea Agreement.

Federal Criminal Procedures

Criminal Procedures
 
From your link:

'In arguing on Tuesday for his client to be released on personal recognizance, defense lawyer Michael Caleb Borges said his client had returned home voluntarily, that there was no evidence she was a danger to anyone else, and that her an ankle monitor would hurt her mental well-being because she had PTSD.'

She suffers from PTSD from a kidnapping that never happened?
Oh ffs!
 
Sherri Papini Screamed 'No,' Ran, and Threw Her Phone When FBI Went to Arrest Her: Prosecutor

from link - "In addition, she cannot have contact with witnesses in the case outside of the presence of her attorney. This would include her husband Keith Papini, who gave her his support after her return from the disappearance."

hmmmmmm

This (no contact with KP) should be of no surprise.

In most state courts, there's a mandatory court order issued to protect Victims and Witnesses -- even if the parties don't want the order or believe the order unnecessary. I think it's likely there's a similar federal statute applicable.

The automatic “mandatory restraining order” is generally in effect from when the defendant is advised of rights at arraignment to the final disposition of any appeal.

The mandatory order is intended to protect the victims/witnesses, where the defendant is automatically restrained from harassing, molesting, intimidating, retaliating against, or tampering with any witness to or victim of the acts charged.

Since violation of this mandatory restraining order can result in separate criminal charges, the order does not always prohibit contact with the husband or the children, for example.

Take note the mandatory court order referenced above is not to be confused with bail conditions imposed on the defendant for release. Bail conditions often include no contact protection orders requested by others and granted by the Court.

IMO, whether KP was named in a mandatory protection order or condition of bond release, I believe it's clear that KP also does not want contact with the defendant here.

For discussion purposes, OP cited § 18-1-1001, C.R.S. (Colorado).

Still Missing - CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, Chaffee Co, 10 May 2020 *arrest* #97
 
I was a huge proponent of giving Sherri the benefit of the doubt like anyone else and to be honest I still can't understand why she was overwhelmingly doubted here while other "victims" of dubious credibility (mostly addicts) are not.

<snip>

I think it's because a lot of us knew girls like this in school (I certainly did). We could see her.
 
Allow me to briefly recap.

Sherri claims she is kidnaped but it turns out that she was staying with an old (boy)friend during those few weeks and two Mexican ladies were not involved at all. She covered or boarded the windows in the room he left her say in. She never ventures out of his apartment. Sherri gets the (boy)friend to brand her shoulder with a phrase. She bangs herself up in order to cause bruises and lops off her 'signature' long hair. A kidnapping specialist gets someone to put up a million dollars to help find SP. Hours before Thanksgiving Day, she appears on the highway, after the (boy)friend releases her. The P family get an acct for crowd source funding. Plus, SP gets taxpayer funding to pay for C-PTSD treatments and counseling.

The (boy)friend claims there was no sex. Why does she want to be with this male if not to make mad passionate love? Perhaps the entire scheme was always about the money and the P's got lots of money from this illegal scheme.

That leaves me wondering:
was KP in on the scheming scam all along and also
will she try to pin the entire kidnapping on the (boy)friend as her defense.

The Judge is convinced in today's hearing to allow her out on bond! I suppose she's celebrating with her family as I write this. Color me flabbergasted.

moo jmovho
 
Sherri Papini kidnapping case: Papini out of jail on bail

3/8/22

As conditions of her release, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeremy Peterson of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California told Papini she must surrender her passport and cannot possess or have any access to firearms or ammunition or be anywhere where firearms are present.

As conditions of her release, the judge also told Papini she must provide a DNA sample and restrict her travel to the Eastern District of California if approved by the court in advance.

The judge also required Papini not to use alcohol or non-prescription narcotics and ordered her to participate in a program of medical or psychiatric treatment. She also must not "associate with or have contact with any witnesses in this case" outside of the presence of her attorney, with the exception of her family members, the judge said.

[..]

Papini's next court appearance is scheduled for March 25. She did not speak during her detainment hearing on Tuesday.

She faces charges of making false statements to a federal law enforcement officer and mail fraud. The maximum prison sentence is five years for the first charge and 20 years for the second. Each charge carries a maximum financial penalty of $250,000 and Peterson said she could also be required to pay restitution.

@Niner

ETA: Except for Law and Crime article linked up-thread, I'm not seeing any other MSM citing defendant can't have contact with her husband Keith (??) :eek:
 
Last edited:
Sherri Papini Screamed 'No,' Ran, and Threw Her Phone When FBI Went to Arrest Her: Prosecutor

from link - "In addition, she cannot have contact with witnesses in the case outside of the presence of her attorney. This would include her husband Keith Papini, who gave her his support after her return from the disappearance."

hmmmmmm
And this link says different. It states "She also must not "associate with or have contact with any witnesses in this case" outside of the presence of her attorney, with the exception of her family members, the judge said."

Sherri Papini kidnapping case: Papini out of jail on bail

The story in this link implies that she can contact her husband.

One of these links has it wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
119
Guests online
1,953
Total visitors
2,072

Forum statistics

Threads
600,251
Messages
18,105,937
Members
230,993
Latest member
Clue Keeper
Back
Top