Gardenista
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 19,034
- Reaction score
- 157,479
Here's another guy she dated
Last edited by a moderator:
What!!!!! I hadn’t heard that!
In a Zoom hearing with Papini appearing on camera from the jail, attorney Michael Borges of Redding asked that she be released on her own recognizance, and said he was concerned about the conditions in the jail. Borges said Papini has food allergies and had only been able to eat part of an apple since her arrest.
I read that her lawyer told the judge she has food allergies and can't eat the jail food. The judge told her lawyer to take it up with the jail.
The lawyer said Papini told jail authorities about her allergies, “but nevertheless she had not been provided with any food other than a part of an apple … to eat.” “She has not been able to eat since she’s been detained yesterday morning,” Borges said.
The judge told Borges that Papini’s dietary concerns would be noted.
neither can anyone else and no one coddles them. this is just a bid for more attn.
Thanks. That helps explain the process. I can see how the committee's assurance that the process conforms with policy could slow the release of the results.I too was interested in the process and found this: (2016 stats for California on pg 14- FDS= Familial DNA Search)
She's probably lying imo.neither can anyone else and no one coddles them. this is just a bid for more attn.
She seems very Münchauseney to me. But she reminds me more of the murderer of Sandra Cantu. Scary woman.
Just my opinion, but as I remember, her children would still be quite young. They cannot arrest her if she is alone with her children without taking them into DFS custody. So if there was another adult (her husband?), typically that person could shield the children from the trauma of watching their mother get arrested.This statement is kind of irritating the more I read it. For one thing, I don't agree with the family that SP has cooperated with LE, by the very fact that she has LIED to them throughout this ordeal since 2016! And also, to deal with her subterfuge, LE ended up having to try a number of ways to get SP to tell the truth, including several her family complains about: through trying to pit hubby against her, and also threatening public embarrassment. It is called trying to get at the facts! The only thing I agree with the family about somewhat, is that SP could have been arrested not in front of the children. But other than that, I don't think their statement will garner much sympathy.
I’ve been trying to figure that out too. It appears that it wasn’t a sexual liaison. I wonder if KP had threatened to leave her or something so she pulled this so he would feel compelled to stay and take care of her. Although it’s pretty obvious she also just loves attention so maybe that’s all there is to it. MooTHIS. You put my thoughts into words.
I wonder what took so long to charge Sherri Papini.
Well, at least Ghislaine Maxwell has never said that - at least I don't think so.Oh no she’s not able to eat jail food. I sense another drama about to unfold.
What, not even half a banana?Oh no she’s not able to eat jail food. I sense another drama about to unfold.
I don't get this - we know she didn't pull it off on her own - she had the help of the ex-bf. Does he mean someone else as well? And why would someone else have been necessary anyway? I just don't get it.
@Logansden77Thanks for the links. I read through them all, and several more.... But it took six months from the request to receiving the results.
Also, in reading through your links and others, no mention was made that a "vote" needs to be taken to release the resuts, as identified on pg 29 line 23 of the Criminal Complaint - ("CA DOJ Familial Search Committee voted to release a familial search result"). I find it interesting that the process to receive the results required a "vote".
But isn't he sticking by her. Still? That's what I'm having trouble understanding.Well, I think if she's convicted the courts will certainly take that into consideration if Keith sues for it. I also think the courts will give him temporary full custody prior to a conviction, with the charges against her.
IMO she must be a nut and the courts will recognize that.
moo